"Show a little love" event!

[MariettaRC]

Oh shiz, I was 1 behind Sarah? Did not expect that.

Though last I checked, I had 100% loves.

Oh well, congrats to Sarah! c:

[Raul]

But...
but...
How did I lose?
At losing?

[Connor]

Oh wow 9th place, was not expecting that. That made my day a bit brighter.

Congrats on winning, Sarah!

[ShinkuDragon]

But...
but...
How did I lose?
At losing?

i'll be honest, i don't dislike you or anything, but i'm also surprised.

i'm surprised i ended at third place too, dafu? and it looks like someone went and rage-unloved everyone lol.

[Satellite]

Ahaha. So that's why I won.

Thanks guys

[Mark]

Only 4 haters?

They spend their time in the My Little Manchildren thread don't they?

[Sarah]

Does this mean I have to marry Satellite?

Get over here, lover boy!

[KhainiWest]

Wow, now I feel deprived of attention.

[Jedward]

Does this mean I have to marry Satellite?

Get over here, lover boy!

Um...

[Eos]

Um...

Don't resist. It's the only natural course.
We need to merge them so they find a neutral balance before either of them goes catastrophic.

[Satellite]

Does this mean I have to marry Satellite?

Get over here, lover boy!

I'm so sorry! I gotta admit I totally misunderstood you as a person. Now I see you in a totally different light. Want a ride baby?

Spoiler

...


wtp I can't believe you did this.



You are cheating on me! This is over gurl!

[Rob]

Top 5 whaaaaaaaaaat

and I'm not even that active these days! rocking and rolling

[Viaje]

I didn't participate, but I am disappoint.

For all the bitching people do about me, I didn't receive a proportional amount of hate.
What's wrong with you people?
Raul beating me, that's not entirely unexpected, but I didn't even know Satellite was a thing.

It's okay though,
I do it all for the two that love me.
I'm your biggest fan.

[Eos]

I didn't receive a proportional amount of hate.

Pretty sure the prevailing thought about most people was that they're not worth it... for one, the whole point of voting no was to cancel out other peoples' 'yes' votes, and no one would've expected you to have any of those to worry about.

[Shidoshi]

I didn't participate, but I am disappoint.

For all the bitching people do about me, I didn't receive a proportional amount of hate.
What's wrong with you people?
Raul beating me, that's not entirely unexpected, but I didn't even know Satellite was a thing.

It's okay though,
I do it all for the two that love me.
I'm your biggest fan.

Satellite won with all his incredible threads where he shows his pride of being atheist and hate towards all the people that are stupid enough to have a religion.

[Viaje]

Pretty sure the prevailing thought about most people was that they're not worth it... for one, the whole point of voting no was to cancel out other peoples' 'yes' votes, and no one would've expected you to have any of those to worry about.

Your snark is adorable as always, but, seeing as plenty of people found it "worth it" to vote on my general rep in the first place, I find that conclusion to be terribad.

Also, pretty sure the point of voting 'no' was to vote 'no' seeing as each end of the spectrum was to have a winner.

Satellite won with all his incredible threads where he shows his pride of being atheist and hate towards all the people that are stupid enough to have a religion.

Aw...
But I too believe that people are stupid to have beliefs.

[Rick]

It's ok Viaje. You don't have to be mad. You'll find love in the future. A very distant future, but it'll happen. Maybe.

[Eos]

Your snark is adorable as always, but, seeing as plenty of people found it "worth it" to vote on my general rep in the first place, I find that conclusion to be terribad.

Voting on you when annoyed and directly dealing with you is not the same as going back in later during a contest like this and going out of the way to sabotage your already-non-existent chances of winning.

Also, pretty sure the point of voting 'no' was to vote 'no' seeing as each end of the spectrum was to have a winner.

Check your literacy again.

• "No" votes will cancel out "Yes" votes on a 1:1 ratio so if you vote yes for Tom and bob votes no for Tom, Tom has 0 love for purposes of our scoring.
• At the end of the event we'll find who ranks amongst Southperry's most (and possibly least) loved members.

[Viaje]

It's ok Viaje. You don't have to be mad. You'll find love in the future. A very distant future, but it'll happen. Maybe.

I already have two loves, apparently.

Other than them, no thanks. Love is gross.

Voting on you when annoyed and directly dealing with you is not the same as going back in later during a contest like this and going out of the way to sabotage your already-non-existent chances of winning.

So we're going to ignore the fact that I could annoy someone multiple times, and, if annoyed during the contest, they might throw a hissy fit by voting "Is not loved"? Certainly out of the question.

Check your literacy again.

For someone who thinks he's so smart, you sure do have pomegranatety logic at times.

Yes, 'no's cancelled out 'yes' votes, but that wasn't the "whole point of voting no" as evidenced by the fact that Satellite won "Most Unloved".
If the contest was entirely unilateral, yes, 'no's would only serve to ensure that someone didn't end up winning "Most Loved", but that wasn't actually the case in this particular instance.

'Yes' cancelled out 'no' just as much as 'no' cancelled out 'yes'.

[Eos]

So we're going to ignore the fact that I could annoy someone multiple times, and, if annoyed during the contest, they might throw a hissy fit by voting "Is not loved"? Certainly out of the question.

That could've been how you got the votes you did. But clearly not everyone you've ever annoyed cared enough to explicitly hunt you down during the event and bothered with you.

For someone who thinks he's so smart, you sure do have pomegranatety logic at times.

Why yes, you do. Pot. Kettle.

Yes, 'no's cancelled out 'yes' votes, but that wasn't the "whole point of voting no" as evidenced by the fact that Satellite won "Most Unloved".
If the contest was entirely unilateral, yes, 'no's would only serve to ensure that someone didn't end up winning "Most Loved", but that wasn't actually the case in this particular instance.

The explicitly stated winning condition of the event was to be "most loved". The unloved was a bonus award, not one stated or implied. You're making up your own rationale, either based on how the results turned out, or on your own flawed understanding of the stated contest parameters.