I agree with you. I just checked about Shidoshi said whether to vote for Niernen or you, and it was literally just saying he was still deciding.
Whereas, I, did give a valid reason why I suggested TheBirds in the first place. He was being inactive, and that's pretty scary as well.
Nope, she gets a kill. It says upon your (Stannis') death. Uh, I PMed her for a target and I guess the kill will go off with the day's lynch, but please don't influence Kyra for the kill. It's her decision and yeah the logistics of revenge kills are kind of hard on forums, haha.
Well that was unfortunate. I was actually inclined to suspect Stannis + Davos + Melisandra (?) would be neutral, but that's obviously incorrect. I did not expect that suicide pact though and it really hits the town hard.
I have no nocturnal events to report unfortunately.
Oh. Would have made more sense if they were separate sentences and not one.
"You die if your partner does. If you die you can revenge kill. " vs. "You die if your partner does and if so you get a revenge kill".
Anyways, more on topic, but yesterdays voting became a mess at the last couple of hours with people switching and suddenly voting with little reasoning.
[vote] @Shidoshi;
An early vote for Kyrastri that you seemed to pass off as as a joke and now aggressively pointing fingers at the admittedly suspicious @LuvDWayULie;
I don't want this to become another game of "Everybody suspects Luv but nobody ever lynches him" but I certainly am not going to jump on him after 1 day. No offense intended, but I'm not into playing kick-the-cripple.
Last edited by MasPan; 2014-09-04 at 11:54 AM.
I really have to agree that Shidoshi looks suspicious. I should have voted for him yesterday in 20/20 hindsight.
[Vote]: @Shidoshi;
Last edited by VerrKol; 2014-09-04 at 04:53 PM.
Missed some early day posts after the day started...so...
While I do agree that Shidoshi is acting awfully aggressive, I do not think that they are mafia.
@Shidoshi; Did anything happen to you last night?
Do you mean for who was killed or who was lynched?
Once again the inactive lynch doesn't do a single thing of good, especially when TheBirds is someone who is typically inactive until Day 3 or 4, if not the majority of the game.
I don't like how you're trying to influence votes without voting yourself.
To be honest that's a pretty shoddy reason when half of us were against an inactivity lynch to begin with.
Plus, everyone's jumping on the inactivity wagon but did anyone even mention him? Notify him? I don't see any until less than an hour before the end of the day, but were talking about lynching him the entire day. It's like you guys intentionally let him play his normal game, when we all know it's his normal game, and used it as an excuse to lynch him.
Additionally, the majority of the votes against him occurred near the end of the day. 2/3 votes against him occurred in the last fifty minutes of the day. Hypermug, and Luv. Hypermug I can understand. Hypermug was The Onion Knight. He may have suspected a roleclaim that is impossible with the knowledge Hypermug had. That's the only reason I can think for Hypermug's late vote, since his post really didn't say anything about his TheBirds vote. But Luv voted for him because of inactivity, when more than a few of us were against an inactivity lynch.
Allow me. [Vote] LuvDWayULie
This isn't to say that I can't be swayed to change my mind towards Luv but I am going to need more than the typical, "Why me?!" "What do you want out of me?" and, "But that's what I think!" responses. Defend yourself with facts.
Really good reasoning regarding Hypermug. I am a bit perturbed that people made a lynch out of TheBirds day 1 despite him almost always becoming really involved ~day 3 or so and usually to some gamechanging results. Especially with no Mentions or attempt to get his attention when under the guise of wanting activity. Nevermind trying to get a player who is notoriously quiet on early days to be active by threatening them. Or someone who had a (until his death) very positive softclaim (even I misunderstood him to think he meant that he was Davos) that nobody had challenged.
My vote is staying on Shidoshi because of his rapid escalation of aggression, but Luv is next on my list.
I will say as well that I'm actually relieved we got hit with a double whammy so early - we can recover from it right now and it improves the odds of us getting a positive lynch. Lategame 2 townie deaths is a massive swing in favor of the mafia. It also minimizes the likelihood of a further nasty surprise later on.
Assuming 3-4 mafians and 1-2 neutrals, we're looking at a best case of 9 remaining townies and a worst case of only 6. I think it's much more likely that it's somewhere in the 8-9 range, which gives us plenty of time to recover.
I can certainly understand people voting for Shidoshi due to his aggressiveness, but all of my memory of Shidoshi's playstyles are pretty outspoken and active. That's why I don't consider it scummy enough to vote for him at this time.
Good point about the early double whammy. I didn't think of it that way, and the revenge kill may work in our favor considering Kyrastri tends to be one who is very observant and make good conclusions.
As for the rest, I'm not sure if you thought the, "Defend Yourself" was pointed at you. I meant that towards Luv. Regardless, good info.
Kyrastri killed herself. Mug was the onion-giver. It's possible someone roleblocked him (unlikely if TheBirds was our only roleblocker), I just find it odd that nobody mentioned finding an onion or anything weird like that. It's possible that his power only served to buff TheBirds, but I find that unlikely. With TheBirds being able to act only on odd number nights, I suspect we have an even nights roleblocker too.
|
Bookmarks