The revealed potential thread!

[Tim군]

this is really happening? lol

have my (nooby) heart for your efforts that i just cubed a little while ago



shut up i'm afraid of scrolling.. and 2% dex nebs are nonexistent according to 7 days of owling

you're a cutie ;)

[Takebacker]

this is really happening? lol

have my (nooby) heart for your efforts that i just cubed a little while ago

[IMG]http://puu.sh/3TW5j.png[/IM


shut up i'm afraid of scrolling.. and 2% dex nebs are nonexistent according to 7 days of owling

It's not worth looking for. Nebs revamped in fall (read: november) update. They'll be cheaper for sure.

[Pink Bean]

It's not worth looking for. Nebs revamped in fall (read: november) update. They'll be cheaper for sure.

ah really? okay, i'll wait for that.

i guess that's a good thing i can't find any..

[thejman250]

>In game event
Are you serious right now. It's the game UI, not an in game EVENT

- Ignorance at it's finest.

- You've yet to prove that the formula that Nexon uses in their code is multiplicative as you are claiming. I'm waiting for you to actually prove that your claim is true however, I highly doubt that you'll be able to do so.

Since you're so bent on "proving" us wrong, why don't you provide proof that the formula is still additive? Apparently all the evidence in the world isn't enough for you, so now it's your turn to prove the world wrong.

- You haven't presented anything to "prove wrong" as you have nothing aside from baseless claims and conjecture.

- Moreover, I've never claimed anything about the formula.

- How about you actually read my post properly, if you do actually posses the ability to read.

- Try again.

I'd like to see you show the coding for Nexon's current PDR formula, otherwise your arguments are invalid as well as your statements. Until you reveal said formula, then the several user's math formula's which conveniently fit the damage reduction taken is conveniently true. And if you choose to ignore me or say that you don't have the time/you absolutely don't care/your just being a troll, then we can render that your statements are yet again invalid and we can move on with our forums. If you chose to reply to me without proper showing of said code, then again your arguments are invalid and you're being no more than a troll. But then again your most likely going to say "Why do I have to listen to someone one the internet?" in which it simply either means A: you're too lazy to show evidece/look into it for yourself B: you can not look into the coding therefore you do not know yourself C: you really do know/don't know but you want to bother us.
Either way you still lose.
Oh and next your going to say "Why don't I show what's in the coding?", my reply would be, "Why do I have to listen to someone else on the internet?". Plus this is my challenge to you, if you back down from the challenge go right ahead.

- Validity is subjective and hence, an opinion.

- My "arguments"? I posted the fact that you need the code to prove what actually exists in the code.

Until you reveal said formula, then the several user's math formula's which conveniently fit the damage reduction taken is conveniently true.

- Exposed utterly illogical child.

- Using the fallacy of ignorance are you? I'm sorry, dear illogical child however, the fallacious drivel that you have just spouted is false. I suggest that you return to grade school to develop a basic understanding of common sense and simple logic as you evidently, don't even have that. The lack of anyone else providing a conjecture does not make the conjecture that you foolishly pulled out of your rear end true. Again, that is disgustingly fallacious and utterly illogical drivel at it's finest.

- Until you actually have proof, your conjectures and baseless claims, will remain just that. Baseless claims.

- I "lose"? How utterly hilarious. The only one who "loses" anything is you all, because you have no proof that PDR is multiplicative. It's sad, isn't it? That all of your drivel is nothing more than mere conjecture.

- Oh, and that's "you're"*. Evidence*.

- Try again, you poor illogical child.

[Tim군]

- Ignorance at it's finest.

- You've yet to prove that the formula that Nexon uses in their code is multiplicative as you are claiming. I'm waiting for you to actually prove that your claim is true however, I highly doubt that you'll be able to do so.




- You haven't presented anything to "prove wrong" as you have nothing aside from baseless claims and conjecture.

- Moreover, I've never claimed anything about the formula.

- How about you actually read my post properly, if you do actually posses the ability to read.

- Try again.



- Validity is subjective and hence, an opinion.

- My "arguments"? I posted the fact that you need the code to prove what actually exists in the code.


- Exposed utterly illogical child.

- Using the fallacy of ignorance are you? I'm sorry, dear illogical child however, the fallacious drivel that you have just spouted is false. I suggest that you return to grade school to develop a basic understanding of common sense and simple logic as you evidently, don't even have that. The lack of anyone else providing a conjecture does not make the conjecture that you foolishly pulled out of your rear end true. Again, that is disgustingly fallacious and utterly illogical drivel at it's finest.

- Until you actually have proof, your conjectures and baseless claims, will remain just that. Baseless claims.

- I "lose"? How utterly hilarious. The only one who "loses" anything is you all, because you have no proof that PDR is multiplicative. It's sad, isn't it? That all of your drivel is nothing more than mere conjecture.

- Oh, and that's "you're"*. Evidence*.

- Try again, you poor illogical child.

I fail to see how I'm being ignorant. I'm the one who posted screenshots of the in game UI and you called it an in game event. And I'm the one being ignorant?
What better way to show how the pdr formula works than by showing the UI which shows EXACTLY how much pdr an item adds. I and countless others have provided evidence to show that the new formula is multiplicative but you have not shown ONE piece of evidence that shows otherwise. So who's the one being ignorant?

Oh and by the way, using big words and repeating the word "ignorant" doesn't make you look smart. It just makes you look like an uneducated twat.

[babo]

you're a cutie ;)

@Pink Bean;

Pretty sure you havent seen how her WA looks like... :S

[CakesXD]

I fail to see how I'm being ignorant. I'm the one who posted screenshots of the in game UI and you called it an in game event. And I'm the one being ignorant?
What better way to show how the pdr formula works than by showing the UI which shows EXACTLY how much pdr an item adds. I and countless others have provided evidence to show that the new formula is multiplicative but you have not shown ONE piece of evidence that shows otherwise. So who's the one being ignorant?

Oh and by the way, using big words and repeating the word "ignorant" doesn't make you look smart. It just makes you look like an uneducated twat.

Psst, maybe if we don't respond to him, he'll go away.

You and @Dark Link have given enough information to prove that PDR is indeed multiplicative, and if he can't accept that, then let him bathe in his own ignorance and stupidity.

[KhainiWest]

Validity is subjective and hence, an opinion.

val·id (vld)
adj.
1. Well grounded; just: a valid objection.
2. Producing the desired results; efficacious: valid methods.
3. Having legal force; effective or binding: a valid title.
4. Logic
a. Containing premises from which the conclusion may logically be derived: a valid argument.
b. Correctly inferred or deduced from a premise: a valid conclusion.
5. Archaic Of sound health; robust.

[Pink Bean]

Pretty sure you havent seen how her WA looks like... :S

it's a work in progress

raccoon mask + smiley mask is nightmares though c:

[WRiPSTER]

- Validity is subjective and hence, an opinion.

Oooh.... Poor choice of words...

So if I go to the border, and they check my passport, and its VALID, that's an opinion? Wow. Thanks for the education there.

[Untradeable]

[/COLOR]val·id (vld)
adj.
1. Well grounded; just: a valid objection.
2. Producing the desired results; efficacious: valid methods.
3. Having legal force; effective or binding: a valid title.
4. Logic
a. Containing premises from which the conclusion may logically be derived: a valid argument.
b. Correctly inferred or deduced from a premise: a valid conclusion.
5. Archaic Of sound health; robust.

[KhainiWest]

it's a work in progress

raccoon mask + smiley mask is nightmares though c:

Yeah...I think the best thing about the smilng mask is the eye patch though. Back when they were uber rare I just wore it with a pirate eye patch. Best looking character in game no contest.

[Arrol]

It's not worth looking for. Nebs revamped in fall (read: november) update. They'll be cheaper for sure.

Where did you hear that?

[Shads]

- Ignorance at it's finest.

- You've yet to prove that the formula that Nexon uses in their code is multiplicative as you are claiming. I'm waiting for you to actually prove that your claim is true however, I highly doubt that you'll be able to do so.




- You haven't presented anything to "prove wrong" as you have nothing aside from baseless claims and conjecture.

- Moreover, I've never claimed anything about the formula.

- How about you actually read my post properly, if you do actually posses the ability to read.

- Try again.



- Validity is subjective and hence, an opinion.

- My "arguments"? I posted the fact that you need the code to prove what actually exists in the code.


- Exposed utterly illogical child.

- Using the fallacy of ignorance are you? I'm sorry, dear illogical child however, the fallacious drivel that you have just spouted is false. I suggest that you return to grade school to develop a basic understanding of common sense and simple logic as you evidently, don't even have that. The lack of anyone else providing a conjecture does not make the conjecture that you foolishly pulled out of your rear end true. Again, that is disgustingly fallacious and utterly illogical drivel at it's finest.

- Until you actually have proof, your conjectures and baseless claims, will remain just that. Baseless claims.

- I "lose"? How utterly hilarious. The only one who "loses" anything is you all, because you have no proof that PDR is multiplicative. It's sad, isn't it? That all of your drivel is nothing more than mere conjecture.

- Oh, and that's "you're"*. Evidence*.

- Try again, you poor illogical child.

I still see no evidence from your part who I assume knows some coding compared to someone who knows no coding at all.
So I'm guessing you also do not know. I don't see why we continue a pointless conversation based on someone who doesn't even try to make any assumption on how the formulas work other than "it's in Nexon's game coding", or should I say "a baseless claim". Also suddenly I am illogical because you have no proof on how the current formula works yet other users have at least attempted to show how the formula works. Ok thanks. It's the internet who cares about grammar, if I was in an English class I would accept that however I don't see how this makes me anymore illogical. Validity is subjective? I do not understand this.

I think I'm done here, don't want to put up with anymore of your asinine tomfoolery of calling people ignorant of at least trying to figure out a forumla or on people whom you do not know. If you would like to quote me on this, that's fine but your really more or less just talking to a wall now, and would be ignorant to even continue with me.

[Takebacker]

Where did you hear that?

Girasol+other evidence. Speculation ultimately but it follows at least.

[Derosis]

- Validity is subjective and hence, an opinion.

- Exposed utterly illogical child.

Oh the ironing. Should take a little bit of your own medicine and read your own shit and proofread.

[Justin]

Oh the ironing. Should take a little bit of your own medicine and read your own shit and proofread.

*giggles*


On topic, I am jelly of your heart's potential @Pink Bean; :(

[Tim군]

50 cubes later

[thejman250]

I fail to see how I'm being ignorant. I'm the one who posted screenshots of the in game UI and you called it an in game event. And I'm the one being ignorant?
What better way to show how the pdr formula works than by showing the UI which shows EXACTLY how much pdr an item adds. I and countless others have provided evidence to show that the new formula is multiplicative but you have not shown ONE piece of evidence that shows otherwise. So who's the one being ignorant?

Oh and by the way, using big words and repeating the word "ignorant" doesn't make you look smart. It just makes you look like an uneducated twat.

- Oh, you do not see the UI IN THE GAME? Ignorance at it's finest. Please tell me how you see the USER INTERFACE without being IN THE GAME. I suggest that you acquire some common sense as this is pathetic.

- The UI showing exactly how much pdr some item adds in KMS, I repeat KMS, proves nothing about the formula that GMS uses in their code for multiple reasons. One is that KMS is not GMS. Yet another reason is that screenshot of your in game event, yes interacting with the USER INTERFACE is done IN THE GAME, shows nothing about how they implement their formula for PDR in their code.

- Provided evidence? You've provided no evidence at all. Countless of you individuals have provided baseless claims without proving that Nexon actually uses such formulas in their code.

- The ones who are ignorant are obviously the lot of you, as you have no choice but to guess at what formula Nexon is actually using in their code.

- Moreover, you're the one making the baseless claims without proof. As such, I have no need to provide anything that says otherwise.

- If you believe that these simple words I am using are "big", I suggest that you return to grade school and retake all of the classes that you have evidently failed, on your search to comprehend basic vocabulary.

- Try again, or not.

Oooh.... Poor choice of words...

So if I go to the border, and they check my passport, and its VALID, that's an opinion? Wow. Thanks for the education there.

- It's a fact that validity is subjective and hence, an opinion. So to answer your question, yes.

- You're also very welcome for this piece of education.

I still see no evidence from your part who I assume knows some coding compared to someone who knows no coding at all.
So I'm guessing you also do not know. I don't see why we continue a pointless conversation based on someone who doesn't even try to make any assumption on how the formulas work other than "it's in Nexon's game coding", or should I say "a baseless claim". Also suddenly I am illogical because you have no proof on how the current formula works yet other users have at least attempted to show how the formula works. Ok thanks. It's the internet who cares about grammar, if I was in an English class I would accept that however I don't see how this makes me anymore illogical. Validity is subjective? I do not understand this.

I think I'm done here, don't want to put up with anymore of your asinine tomfoolery of calling people ignorant of at least trying to figure out a forumla or on people whom you do not know. If you would like to quote me on this, that's fine but your really more or less just talking to a wall now, and would be ignorant to even continue with me.

- Dear illogical child, I don't require any evidence as I've yet to make any claim about the formula. Common sense.

- Why would I sit here and play the guessing game with you children, when you are evidently unable to prove that your inane claims are true?

- "Suddenly illogical"? Dear child, it's quite evident that you've been illogical for quite some time.

- I'll iterate this again: I don't need any proof about how the current formula works as I've made no claim about it. Yes, other users have made baseless claims and conjecture about how the new formula works without any proof to show that their conjecture is fact. How cute.

- Yes, validity is subjective, dear child. Oh you don't understand this? Well, that's not my problem.

who doesn't even try to make any assumption on how the formulas work other than "it's in Nexon's game coding", or should I say "a baseless claim".

- Ignorance at it's finest. It's a fact that any formula that Nexon uses for their game is in the code for the game, as games are made with, wait for it ---, code. I suggest that you do a quick google search and actually find out how video games work. Here's a hint, they aren't made by boiling ingredients in hot cauldrons at Hogwarts, whilst under the watchful eye of Professor Snape.

- Formula*, among other things. You're*.

- The only ones here who are asinine are the lot of you who make baseless claims without any proof.

- Try again.

Oh the ironing. Should take a little bit of your own medicine and read your own shit and proofread.

- Irony*. Yes, the irony is indeed strong with this one.

- The one who needs to proofread is definitely you, dear child. Oh and profanity? How cute. And you have the audacity to call other people's posts "ironing". How utterly hilarious and hypocritical.

- Try again.

[Pink Bean]

ok this is quite ridiculous, you're going to be banned from this thread i bet

quit baiting with your "try again" bullpomegranate.
it's not like me to say anything during these things but it's really getting out of hand