Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 35
  1. ᗧ ∑ ∑ ∑ ᗣ ∑ ∑ ∑ ᗣ ᗣ Straight Male
    IGN: Helsinki
    Server: MYBCKN
    Level: 210
    Job: Aran
    Guild: Friends
    Alliance: Unbreakable
    finland

    Default US to spend $352bil on nuclear arsenal


    http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/...650_story.html


    I thought the US economy was in trouble? Well it's only $352 billion! It's not even that much money!

  2. Default Re: US to spend $352bil on nuclear arsenal


    Democracy and freedom are in even more trouble.

  3. Default Re: US to spend $352bil on nuclear arsenal


    Always money for war, never money for the hunger.
    EARTH AT IT'S FINEST.

  4. Certified Pimento Bi Male
    IGN: xxxxFenixR
    Server: Bera
    Level: Mix
    Job: Severals
    Guild: None
    Alliance: Nada
    Farm: Wut?
    venezuela

    Default Re: US to spend $352bil on nuclear arsenal


    You gotta love americans and their weapons obsessions.

  5. Default Re: US to spend $352bil on nuclear arsenal


    The pineapple do you need 5,113 warheads for? 1000 should be plenty.

  6. Default Re: US to spend $352bil on nuclear arsenal


    This unsettles me.
    Nuclear weapons should be the last resort in terms of war, are we expecting another war huh?

  7. Default Re: US to spend $352bil on nuclear arsenal


    Yeah the number amount isn't what bothers me about this.. I suppose disarming would be stupid though, I just wish they wouldn't publicize nuclear warheads at all in this day and age.

    The thought of them upgrading the missiles/warehouse just brings the thought that they may want to use nuclear powers in the near future.

  8. Default Re: US to spend $352bil on nuclear arsenal


    I would rather they upgrade them than disarm or worse yet do nothing with them. Disarming them would make us less threatening to the people willing to do stupid pomegranate in the world (yes, stupider pomegranate than we ourselves would do), and leaving them obsolete with no maintenance for decades seems like a one way road to radioactive leakage killing millions of people.

  9. Orbital Bee Cannon
    IGN: SaptaZapta
    Server: Kradia
    Level: 225
    Job: Hero
    Guild: Matriarchy
    Alliance: Dominion

    Default Re: US to spend $352bil on nuclear arsenal


    If you want peace, prepare for war.

    Enemies have this unsportsmanlike tendency to attack when they know you're not prepared.
    Unless you're going to argue that the USA has no enemies?

  10. Default Re: US to spend $352bil on nuclear arsenal


    20 pineappleing 12. Gj America

  11. Default Re: US to spend $352bil on nuclear arsenal


    How did we stop world war 2? Nuke

    How did we stop the middle east? Nuke

    SENSE.

  12. Default Re: US to spend $352bil on nuclear arsenal


    The communist countries that have theirs and threaten to use theirs?

    Also all this work is spreading money through the US economy, only thing that would be getting imported was needed materials we can't produce (which would probably be about half ~ 4/6 of that 352 billion USD).

  13. Default Re: US to spend $352bil on nuclear arsenal


    HOW WILL WE END THE WORLD? NUKE. SENSE INDEED.

  14. ᗧ ∑ ∑ ∑ ᗣ ∑ ∑ ∑ ᗣ ᗣ Straight Male
    IGN: Helsinki
    Server: MYBCKN
    Level: 210
    Job: Aran
    Guild: Friends
    Alliance: Unbreakable
    finland

    Default Re: US to spend $352bil on nuclear arsenal



    When you don't get the point, you just don't get it.

    You will never use 5113 nukes without destroying the whole earth. Never. It's not about who has the most nukes, but who uses them first and smartest. Though, when it comes to Russia vs. USA, both countries would probably end up bombing each other into extinction.

  15. Default Re: US to spend $352bil on nuclear arsenal


    An estimate of 352 billion over the next 10 years. Not all at once, folks.

  16. Default Re: US to spend $352bil on nuclear arsenal


    I don't think you guy's actually understand what's going on lol.

    1) We're pulling out, we're going to the pacific, next action hasn't been determined yet, but here's the problem. When we pull out and become isolationist's we lose clear visibility and intel concerning other countries. We have technology but there's limitations that can't overcome just simply being there. So when we pull out, the world is going to get rattled as we abandoned them to deal with the threat themselves. We become a target. Unless we build large moats with crocodiles alligators and fences that reach the atmosphere, we're fuc`ked.

    2) By pulling out we no longer can flex our offense. We leave looking vulnerable, so refer to point number one, we need defense.

    3) Our nuclear arms fleet has been decaying the last 2-3 decades. This administration has to bite the bullet and destroy it. Nuclear arms slowly decay and rot out even the capsules they are kept in, plus we want a method of retaliation if we face worst case scenario.

  17. Default Re: US to spend $352bil on nuclear arsenal



    No I got the point, I'm pretty sure we all know they're not going to shoot them. They're insurance and the consequences for using them is too great to use them. You need to take a second to think "Hrm, maybe we all know that no one is going to shoot off Nuclear missiles".

    Also using a meme to use a response makes you look stupid. Just saying.

  18. Default Re: US to spend $352bil on nuclear arsenal


    1 can wipe out Moscow..........

  19. Default Re: US to spend $352bil on nuclear arsenal


    About time.

  20. Default Re: US to spend $352bil on nuclear arsenal


    There is no smart way to use nuclear weapons. Or any weapon that ravages the land so horribly for that matter.

  21.  

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •