If true then the entire "do we have to just continuously repost that guy saying the login server returns the real password to the client till they change it?" is asking for something that already happened and still has no value.
Either way may point was correct. Why would we continue asking for something that no one has demonstrated (still) exists and no one could confirm the first time it was alleged? People keep repeating it over and over like it's something there was any evidence for.
Bookmarks