
Originally Posted by
Polantaris
4) Holypie; We have conflicting cop stories here.
Meta says that Corn is bad.
Corn says VerrKol is bad.
If Corn is good, Meta is bad and VerrKol is bad. If Meta is good, Corn is bad and VerrKol is good. They cannot be both right, as one claims the other is bad. Which do you think it is? Personally, I think Corn is bad. Why? Because we already had an Investigator with a qualifier for investigating. Having two would be weird, as there's usually one flat out Investigator that has no restrictions (aside from interventions). This would imply towards Meta over Corn, which means Corn is bad and VerrKol is good. Corn also tried to make excuses for his ability, instead of just pretending to forget to vote. Plenty of people have forgotten to vote, so why did Corn feel the need to create a precedent for his Investigating abilities unless he intended to claim to be good all along, but not really be? Why the shenanigans?
Not only that, but saying both Meta and VerrKol is bad at once would imply that nearly all of the mafia has been revealed at once. Convenient, isn't it?
Above even that, Corn replies second in the day, saying that he would post his thoughts later? Why? Except to gauge the field and intentionally start getting people against each other? I believe Corn is Mafia, and I believe you should be against him.
Either way, even if we're wrong, one of those two are Mafia, which means that we get a confirmed kill either way, it just might take an extra day.
Bookmarks