5,000 codes and just <2000 users?
I can already see my character on that chair.
![]()
I was making a logical guess based on the SP database, they do still have a form of tradeblock tag, but they are tradeable until someone equips them.
For instance, all "reverse" items have this form of tag, you can trade them as many times as you would like, until you (or someone else) equips them, at which point they're permanently binded to the character.
Don't take the user number as a solid limit on people participating for codes. There are a significant number of people that aren't signed up taking part too.5,000 codes and just <2000 users?
Alright, tenouttaten.
10/10
Enjoying using the database, but don't like how it's set out.
I don't like the layout and how it's presented. A suggestion would be remaking the interface in response to your next event. It might be simple and works the way it is, but this is my personal opinion.
I do how ever like how you can search everything, this includes seeing the Ambition exp etc.
Your event is unique and you have to actually put some effort in, so I commend you on that. It shows you have actually put some effort into it as well.
PS. Don't hurt me.
Which interface are you recommend be redesigned, the quiz, or the database?
They're unrelated, the DB wasn't built to be a cheat sheet for the event, it's built to be the most flexible search tool it could be since everyone's reasons for looking up mobs maps and gear tend to be different, as does what they're interested in seeing. The results themselves are actually template based and easily extended, as demonstrated by the list vs detail views. We can specialize any number of specific result pages per category, but no one has ever requested anything beyond what it shows.
Er, is there a way to see which question I got wrong? Unless I checked the wrong bubble about King Sage Cat's Ambition, I am pretty sure I had the other four correct.
Or is that issue with Thief/Bowman being mixed up still a thing?
ffff i missed one. there goes a day delay
5/5 once again.![]()
@Eos; I think a great addition to the database if you could kind of space out or somehow separate the results. Seeing 3-6 monsters all the same level it does take a little more effort to keep track when doublechecking. Other than that I'm surprised I haven't abused this feature before
Oh sadness, 14/15 as of today. I have a feeling that I derped severely on who founded SP.![]()
|
Bookmarks