That's just why I hate working with Google. Am I allowed to say moralpapayas? Fruit version will do.
That's just why I hate working with Google. Am I allowed to say moralpapayas? Fruit version will do.
Hope the appeal goes smoothly, seems kinda weird that the Google robots or w/e picked up on something from so long ago that no one cares about.
lol I love my life right now.
IT'S LIKE THE BUTTERFLY EFFECT. BUT WITH GOOGLE.
And karma, or something.
Google has it cached if anyone is interested.
It's possible that someone, maybe even someone with no relation to SP, searched for such content, found the thread, and the search engine having found the thread threw out the warning for it.
I of course have no idea if that's how it works, but it wouldn't surprise me if it was similar to that scenario.
How much does sp get from ad sense.?
That's why I have a feeling Google is trying to play punk and pull a fast one here, just like Sony going on random infringement allegations about copyright. Case in point: Sony blocking Valentina Lisitsa's Youtube video of the Mozart K466 piano concerto on the grounds that the pianist is Martin Stadtfeld.
Quote from the pianist herself:
And this. Precisely. Porn doesn't simply appear on your suggested google searches if you haven't been actively searching for such content.
Oh, don't you know the half it! I remember a bunch of threads from the old days that if posted today would geteveryone bannedINFRACTIONS! INFRACTIONS EVERYWHERE!
It would have to be content safe though I believe. The obscenity rule applies to even if you're quoting something so it should apply to if you post a link to the thread?
Well. looks like I better try to scrub though some of my old posts then........
On the flip side, this is why we can't have nice things and post bikini girls with impunity. Sorry to hear some past actions have somehow come back to bite the site in the metaphorical ass.
looooooooooool.
|
Bookmarks