I really hope that wasn't at me.
I'm ambiguous for a reason, 'SIR'.
Nope, completely legitimate.
Never touched a duped scroll in my life, never swore, never had multiple accounts, all that jazz.
A stickler at heart, a rebel by definition.
Eos can not prove Nexon's intent, I would love to see that.
Actually, what I would really love to see is someone, ANYONE, prove anything in a thread like this. Because so far.. it's full of retards.
Noice sentence. A++, makes total sense.
Implying that I admitted that I hacked.
Not implying that I hacked?
Not admitting that I hacked by assumption?
Not even implying that I ADMIT, which is the past tense, that I have ever hacked.
No! I'm certainly not "implying that I'm admitting that I hacked before".
Bookmarks