The horrible secret behind starter pokemon
#21
First gen: Pikachu(Yes, pokemon yellow)
Second gen: Cyndaquil
Third gen: Torchic
Fourth gen: Turtwig
Fifth gen: Tepig. Should have chosen Oshawott though. Pig sucks.
Reply
#22
Why is Mudkip in the starters not being selected?

I though he's the king of all
Reply
#23
Seanny Wrote:Also, idgaf about the Snivy bandwagon. Not my fault the other two starters are ugly as sin when fully evolved.

Samurott looks intense though. Shine

1st Gen: Pikachu (Yay Pokemon Yellow)
2nd Gen: Totodile (Feraligatr was beast)
3rd Gen: Torchic on Ruby and Mudkip on Sapphire
4th Gen: Didn't play any of them (yet...)
5th Gen: Oshawott

So yea. Usually a water fan most of the time. I've never been a fan of grass though. :/
Reply
#24
When I first played Pokemon Red, I started with Charmander. FFFFFFFFF Brock's Onyx Sad
Reply
#25
NoJobNoRules Wrote:Samurott looks intense though. Shine

I can't stand the 1st 2 evolutions, but the 3rd does look tough at least, but i tend to prefer cool or cute asthetics over tough looking. Venussaur was my one exception because the anime just made Bulbasaur so badass.

1.Bulbasaur
2.Chikorita
3.Treecko (only borrowed it though. I generally skipped that generation)
4.Pliplup (Steel/Water? Pretty interesting.)
5.Snivy
Reply
#26
Made a thread Wink

If it's confusing, fk the rules and just post all the starters you've ever gotten Tongue
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: