Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
[Module] GMS - Potential Pools
#1
As per request of [MENTION=7678]ShinkuDragon[/MENTION];

 Pool A
 Pool B
 Pool C
 Pool D
 Pool E
 Mu Lung Dojo Buffs

If you find any mistakes, please tell me.
Reply
#2
Thank you Locked. I know I've wanted a refreshed list and I'm sure tons of other people are happy with this.

I haven't had time to look at it in detail, but are these all normal potential options? Would it be possible to have a separate one with bonus potential options?

edit: These look to include bonus and normal potentials, so I'll rephrase my question: is there any way to differentiate the two?
Reply
#3
Marksman Bryan Wrote:Thank you Locked. I know I've wanted a refreshed list and I'm sure tons of other people are happy with this.

I haven't had time to look at it in detail, but are these all normal potential options? Would it be possible to have a separate one with bonus potential options?

edit: These look to include bonus and normal potentials, so I'll rephrase my question: is there any way to differentiate the two?

for you and anyone else that comes with the same question, according to fiel it was:

tier of potential: XNXXXX

where N is:
0 for rare secondary
1 for rare primary (epic secondary)
2 for epic primary (unique secondary)
3 for unique primary (legendary secondary)
4 for legendary primary

XX0XXX means regular potential
XX1XXX are decent skills
XX2XXX means additional potential
Reply
#4
=o neat-o!

I plan to use this often =3 I've gone back to playing my Battle Mage, and I'd like to replace the 8th anniversary set w/ a well-scrolled and decent-potential'd level 110 set~
Now I can take a good look at what my best options are! =3
Reply
#5
wait but this is a new pot?how about the dojo glove?can someone explain to me?
Reply
#6
ShinkuDragon Wrote:tier of potential: XNXXXX

where N is:
0 for rare secondary
1 for rare primary (epic secondary)
2 for epic primary (unique secondary)
3 for unique primary (legendary secondary)
4 for legendary primary

so if X4XXXX is legendary, and dojo is X6XXXX...
FIFTH TIER INBOUND ./falsehype
Reply
#7
Ivangold Wrote:wait but this is a new pot?how about the dojo glove?can someone explain to me?
it's the current potential system we have on gms.
Marksman Bryan Wrote:so if X4XXXX is legendary, and dojo is X6XXXX...
FIFTH TIER INBOUND ./falsehype

well, they certainly left the hole, "just in case" i'm sure Rolleyes
and i DID call fifth tier ages ago, i'm calling it again now, with a red-pinkish border color f3 (same claim as before)
Reply
#8
[quote=ShinkuDragon]it's the current potential system we have on gms.


but what's gonna change?:f6:
Reply
#9
Does this include nebulite potentials as well?
Reply
#10
Marksman Bryan Wrote:so if X4XXXX is legendary, and dojo is X6XXXX...
FIFTH TIER INBOUND ./falsehype

Look at scrolling colors: Blue, Purple, Yellow/gold, Green Red.
Look at potential colors: Blue, Purple, Yellow, Green.

See where Im going? Monocle
Reply
#11
Niernen Wrote:Look at scrolling colors: Blue, Purple, Yellow/gold, Green Red.
Look at potential colors: Blue, Purple, Yellow, Green.

See where Im going? Monocle

MANN, WOOOTT Glitter problably weapons lv121+ may have like 4%(rare) and now is 3% so wooot Glitter man that's awsome Biggrin for sure
but wait am i right?:f6:
or it is just like a new type of pot?(i mean unique go to legendary then legendary to the new one)
Reply
#12
Marksman Bryan Wrote:so if X4XXXX is legendary, and dojo is X6XXXX...
FIFTH TIER INBOUND ./falsehype

idk if i'm right i think dojo is X7XXX
Reply
#13
Ivangold Wrote:idk if i'm right i think dojo is X7XXX
dojo glove is the X6XXXX, it says so in the OP.
Ivangold Wrote:[quote=ShinkuDragon]it's the current potential system we have on gms.


but what's gonna change?:f6:

nothing, the changes already happened, this is what's current.
Reply
#14
fodjgngf Wrote:Does this include nebulite potentials as well?

http://www.southperry.net/showthread.php?t=54534
Reply
#15
guess i might as well, [MENTION=2054]Eos[/MENTION]; think this thread could go in references?
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: