Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
American Censorship Day.
#21
Locked Wrote:Heh.

Even 4chan is involved
[Image: 8MAm]

If this bill passes, I wouldn't be surprised if Anon starts WWIII.
Reply
#22
Daamn it alll. Its pathetic, but I start to lose it if I can't go on the internet for a while. Sent in a letter, and hoping for the best, otherwise I just lost a bit of my sanity.
Reply
#23
PervyLion Wrote:If this were to pass and 4chan goes down. There goes basically 99% of the land of internet humor and other amazing things.

Then again there also goes 99% of all internet trolls.
Reply
#24
Corn Wrote:Then again there also goes 99% of all internet trolls.

4chan doesn't make trolls, it just feeds them past midnight.
Reply
#25
Corn Wrote:Then again there also goes 99% of all internet trolls.
More like they'll move to someplace else and if they can't do it on the internet...
Lets just say is better they do it there.
Reply
#26
I wonder if technology is the odd ball in this game, or do politicians really get to decide on everything they have absolutely no clue about?
Reply
#27
Corn Wrote:Then again there also goes 99% of all internet trolls.

Oooooh not really, think of it this way.

The trolls are all there. Only they take out the box they inhabit in. So expect the rest of the internet full of them.
Reply
#28
lol if this bill passes, I'm liable for jail time @ casting vidya on Twitch and posting gaming vids on YT. Rolleyes

So SPers... please do what you can so that I won't have to go to jail. xd
Reply
#29
Worst case scenario: They create a wall. Don't worry though, we'll find a way around it like we always do.
Reply
#30
I don't know why you guys are all worried about this, even if it passes it wouldn't last more than 3 months or won't be enforced lol
Reply
#31
Obama will veto if it passes.

[Image: tumblr_lus45t3NRa1qidi6ro1_500.png]
Reply
#32
Oh look Obama's polls suddenly swinged to support him. Rolleyes Kind of expected considering how he's more tech oriented then most of DC, or at least trying to modernize lol
Reply
#33
KhainiWest Wrote:Oh look Obama's polls suddenly swinged to support him. Rolleyes Kind of expected considering how he's more tech oriented then most of DC, or at least trying to modernize lol

Not really seeing as he's opposed of the idea from the beginning.
Reply
#34
Netto Wrote:Not really seeing as he's opposed of the idea from the beginning.

Details, details, no one noticed that until it was actually a threat, dont you know how politics work?!
Reply
#35
Rick Wrote:Would the websites be able to avoid this just by moving operations out of America, then?
If they don't mind losing their American audience entirely, sure.

American ISPs would still be forced to block non-American sites, it's not implemented in a way you can just get around by moving the server. The main stated intent is actually to prevent foreign piracy sites from being viewed inside the USA.
Reply
#36
Kalovale Wrote:I wonder if technology is the odd ball in this game, or do politicians really get to decide on everything they have absolutely no clue about?

[Image: Oldfarts.PNG]

Do you think these guys use the internet?

Netto Wrote:Obama will veto if it passes.

[Image: tumblr_lus45t3NRa1qidi6ro1_500.png]

Considering he used the internet a lot in his campaign and isn't that old, I don't find it too surprising.
Reply
#37
Stereo Wrote:If they don't mind losing their American audience entirely, sure.

American ISPs would still be forced to block non-American sites, it's not implemented in a way you can just get around by moving the server. The main stated intent is actually to prevent foreign piracy sites from being viewed inside the USA.

There is still ways to circumvent that, but doing so would be considered illegal if the bill where to pass i think.
Reply
#38
Kunagisa Wrote:Do you think these guys use the internet?

I doubt the first one even knows how to use a cellphone....
Reply
#39
案山子 Wrote:I doubt the first one even knows how to use a cellphone....
Why would he? Thats the slav... serva... assistant work.
Reply
#40
Quote:Supporters of the rules say they preserve competition and protect consumer choice, but opponents argue they impose unnecessary burdens on businesses and amount to government regulation of the Internet.

Je ne comprends pas. Someone elaborate please.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)