So pretty much what happend to Senna, but still I hate those tracks, too many cars, too close to each other and too fast.
|
Dan Wheldon dies in a massive pileup in the IndyCar 300 race, Las Vegas
|
|
2011-10-18, 02:49 AM
Corn Wrote:What do you mean, remote controllable?Controllable by remote. You know, like the unmanned drones in the military?
2011-10-18, 03:32 AM
Flonne Wrote:Controllable by remote. You know, like the unmanned drones in the military?Or like this:
2011-10-18, 09:03 AM
Flonne Wrote:Controllable by remote. You know, like the unmanned drones in the military? Which is where the Bread-and-Circuses mentality of the human race rears its ugly head. Fact is, far far fewer people would watch if nobody were risking their lives or at least limbs.
2011-10-18, 10:27 AM
May be a bit offtopic, but just looked more into these series and NASCAR... No offence, it's a joke. Formula 1 is quite boring, can't imagine series where they will just drive around a road shaped like oval.
2011-10-18, 11:37 AM
Satellite Wrote:May be a bit offtopic, but just looked more into these series and NASCAR... No offence, it's a joke. Formula 1 is quite boring, can't imagine series where they will just drive around a road shaped like oval. Then don't even comment about it. Racing is boring if you don't know what's involved in every single race. If we took your view on this, the only exciting race is Le Mans 24... or some WRC Prime in stadiums. I dunno. Plus, Indy has Danica Patrick <3 Off-topic: I'm still wondering why we haven't had a Dennis Ritchie thread yet.
2011-10-18, 11:54 AM
Satellite Wrote:May be a bit offtopic, but just looked more into these series and NASCAR... No offence, it's a joke. Formula 1 is quite boring, can't imagine series where they will just drive around a road shaped like oval. >Comparing Formula 1 to Nascar CONGRATULATIONS! YOU'RE A RUHTARD! DURR! DURR! DURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!
2011-10-18, 01:49 PM
Rob Wrote:Off-topic: I'm still wondering why we haven't had a Dennis Ritchie thread yet.I'm kinda glad, I don't want to see a topic of his death go down the shitter like the ones with been having lately.
2011-10-18, 04:53 PM
SaptaZapta Wrote:Which is where the Bread-and-Circuses mentality of the human race rears its ugly head.Well, I was saying that earlier, but they said that's not what racing is about. ;_;
2011-10-18, 06:14 PM
Flonne Wrote:Well, I was saying that earlier, but they said that's not what racing is about. ;_;Formula 1 level racing is pretty expensive, meaning they need actual sponsors, fans, etc. If they went virtual, they wouldn't need the big money and you may as well just do it yourself in a videogame... For about $400 you can get 80% of the way there, if you have $100,000 you could get a setup that's nearly indistinguishable from reality (a few racing teams have this, cause it's cheaper than practice in the real car).
2011-10-18, 06:23 PM
Stereo Wrote:Formula 1 level racing is pretty expensive, meaning they need actual sponsors, fans, etc. If they went virtual, they wouldn't need the big money and you may as well just do it yourself in a videogame... For about $400 you can get 80% of the way there, if you have $100,000 you could get a setup that's nearly indistinguishable from reality (a few racing teams have this, cause it's cheaper than practice in the real car).Or I'm not getting something or you didn't get what he meant, if I'm not wrong Flonne just said to move the driver from the quite dangerous car into a booth while pretty much the rest stays the same, same car, same team, same million dollars spent for each race; just that the driver would do the driving off the car. Edit: If the image I posted confused someone, what I meant is that the control should emulate the actual car unlike the drone controls that don't:
2011-10-18, 06:47 PM
Luxeraph Wrote:Or I'm not getting something or you didn't get what he meant, if I'm not wrong Flonne just said to move the driver from the quite dangerous car into a booth while pretty much the rest stays the same, same car, same team, same million dollars spent for each race; just that the driver would do the driving off the car. If you actually like racing... that's utterly retarded. An idea without a single bit of charm poured over it.
2011-10-18, 06:57 PM
Rob Wrote:If you actually like racing... that's utterly retarded. An idea without a single bit of charm poured over it.I will never claim to get it, then :l Seems like a perfectly workable solution to me...
2011-10-18, 07:15 PM
Rob Wrote:If you actually like racing... that's utterly retarded. An idea without a single bit of charm poured over it.Well its that or slowing the cars down (what F1 does) but taking in mind how Americans think (bigger is better and therefore faster is better) I don't think they will slow the cars down even if that makes the sport safer.
2011-10-18, 07:16 PM
Flonne Wrote:I will never claim to get it, then :l Let's make airplane activities and the such controlled remotely too! No, the human factor is really a big part of the issue. While we're at it, let's also ban or change the way motorbike racing is performed at the moment, that'd be a terrific idea.
2011-10-18, 11:05 PM
Rob Wrote:Let's make airplane activities and the such controlled remotely too!That actually sounds cooler, too. They would be able to perform better tricks and stunts due to not having to worry about gravitational force, I don't know, collapsing their internal organs if they even tried certain things? |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

