2010-03-25, 03:52 PM
How exactly is a picture of a masturbation toy on Amazon inappropriate? It wasn't even about the product. It was the hilarity of the related products.
|
Customers who bought this item also bought....
|
|
2010-03-25, 03:52 PM
How exactly is a picture of a masturbation toy on Amazon inappropriate? It wasn't even about the product. It was the hilarity of the related products.
2010-03-25, 03:53 PM
Cynic Wrote:I decided to delete it. I don't want to accidentally scar some little child who doesn't even know what a D**** is. Whatever would I do? It would haunt me for the rest of my life!Well that answers my question (even though I had already assumed it was that from Greg's "toy" comment and the related Cup Nude link/image)
2010-03-25, 03:54 PM
FelixTM Wrote:How exactly is a picture of a masturbation toy on Amazon inappropriate? It wasn't even about the product. It was the hilarity of the related products. Posted before I could post it.
2010-03-25, 03:57 PM
FelixTM Wrote:How exactly is a picture of a masturbation toy on Amazon inappropriate? It wasn't even about the product. It was the hilarity of the related products.Built specifically to resemble and depict a vagina. Then again, that "one rule" thread was never explained to me. :<
2010-03-25, 03:58 PM
I'm with everyone else on this, and I am pretty harsh on bad imagery. The image was pretty unoffensive. You could always censor the hole on the fleshlight hahahaha
2010-03-25, 03:58 PM
I saw the original post, I didn't find (well I did a little, but didn't really care) anything wrong with it, since the joke was with the related products.
@Sarah, he did do that, then deleted it for some reason
2010-03-25, 03:59 PM
Providence Wrote:Built specifically to resemble and depict a vagina. Then again, that "one rule" thread was never explained to me. :< No porn and trolling. Nothing else.
2010-03-25, 04:00 PM
Milelke Wrote:I saw the original post, I didn't find (well I did a little, but didn't really care) anything wrong with it, since the joke was with the related products. >Implying you didn't report that post.
2010-03-25, 04:00 PM
Milelke Wrote:I saw the original post, I didn't find (well I did a little, but didn't really care) anything wrong with it, since the joke was with the related products. Again, I deleted it. But I'll repost it without showing the picture this time gimme a sec.
2010-03-25, 04:10 PM
It's back guys. It is now SP friendly! I'm sure this will be hilarious for anyone 3 and under! =]
2010-03-25, 04:13 PM
Cynic Wrote: This version is stupid. Requesting removal out of depression.
2010-03-25, 04:14 PM
Roxas Wrote:In other breaking news, centuries-old pictures resurfaced in the funhouse. That's impossible, WoW is not a century year old, therefore this statement is false.
2010-03-25, 04:18 PM
(4:01:34 PM) Fiel: If someone posted two charmanders going at it I don't care. It's more about human pornography I care about.
Testing
I don't even have furry stuff saved in my folders, but I looked this up just for the experiment.
2010-03-25, 04:19 PM
Cynic Wrote:That's impossible, WoW is not a century year old, therefore this statement is false. On the internet, everything ages millions of times faster.
2010-03-25, 04:19 PM
Spideyjvc Wrote:(4:01:34 PM) Fiel: If someone posted two charmanders going at it I don't care. It's more about human pornography I care about. I will not report you. Dusk Wrote:On the internet, everything ages millions of times faster. Except us...except us...
2010-03-25, 04:23 PM
Cynic Wrote:It's back guys. It is now SP friendly! I'm sure this will be hilarious for anyone 3 and under! =]My edit was prettier... ;_: |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|