Customers who bought this item also bought....
#21
How exactly is a picture of a masturbation toy on Amazon inappropriate? It wasn't even about the product. It was the hilarity of the related products.
#22
Cynic Wrote:I decided to delete it. I don't want to accidentally scar some little child who doesn't even know what a D**** is. Whatever would I do? It would haunt me for the rest of my life!

In all seriousness I don't want to "offend" anyone in the long run
Well that answers my question (even though I had already assumed it was that from Greg's "toy" comment and the related Cup Nude link/image)
#23
FelixTM Wrote:How exactly is a picture of a masturbation toy on Amazon inappropriate? It wasn't even about the product. It was the hilarity of the related products.

Posted before I could post it.
#24
FelixTM Wrote:How exactly is a picture of a masturbation toy on Amazon inappropriate? It wasn't even about the product. It was the hilarity of the related products.
Built specifically to resemble and depict a vagina. Then again, that "one rule" thread was never explained to me. :<
#25
I'm with everyone else on this, and I am pretty harsh on bad imagery. The image was pretty unoffensive. You could always censor the hole on the fleshlight hahahaha
#26
I saw the original post, I didn't find (well I did a little, but didn't really care) anything wrong with it, since the joke was with the related products.

@Sarah, he did do that, then deleted it for some reason Sad
#27
Providence Wrote:Built specifically to resemble and depict a vagina. Then again, that "one rule" thread was never explained to me. :<

No porn and trolling.

Nothing else.
#28
Milelke Wrote:I saw the original post, I didn't find (well I did a little, but didn't really care) anything wrong with it, since the joke was with the related products.

>Implying you didn't report that post.

[Image: nlwnyb.jpg]
#29
Milelke Wrote:I saw the original post, I didn't find (well I did a little, but didn't really care) anything wrong with it, since the joke was with the related products.

@Sarah, he did do that, then deleted it for some reason Sad

Again, I deleted it. But I'll repost it without showing the picture this time gimme a sec.
#30
inb4Greggetsbanned.
#31
Infraction reversed.

FOILED AGAIN.

[Image: snidely1.jpg]
#32
It's back guys. It is now SP friendly! I'm sure this will be hilarious for anyone 3 and under! =]
#33
In other breaking news, centuries-old pictures resurfaced in the funhouse.
#34
Cynic Wrote:[Image: S4CBa.jpg]

southperry friendly!

This version is stupid.

Requesting removal out of depression. Sad
#35
Roxas Wrote:In other breaking news, centuries-old pictures resurfaced in the funhouse.

That's impossible, WoW is not a century year old, therefore this statement is false.
#36
(4:01:34 PM) Fiel: If someone posted two charmanders going at it I don't care. It's more about human pornography I care about.

 Testing

I don't even have furry stuff saved in my folders, but I looked this up just for the experiment.
#37
Cynic Wrote:That's impossible, WoW is not a century year old, therefore this statement is false.

On the internet, everything ages millions of times faster.
#38
Spideyjvc Wrote:(4:01:34 PM) Fiel: If someone posted two charmanders going at it I don't care. It's more about human pornography I care about.

 Testing

I don't even have furry stuff saved in my folders, but I looked this up just for the experiment.

I will not report you.

Dusk Wrote:On the internet, everything ages millions of times faster.

Except us...except us...
#39
Cynic Wrote:It's back guys. It is now SP friendly! I'm sure this will be hilarious for anyone 3 and under! =]
My edit was prettier... ;_:
#40
Greg Wrote:>Implying you didn't report that post.

I can see her nipple.


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)