Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
New iTCG Set 4 info
#41
Androo posted up some pictures of some of the cards, proof they are real?
Reply
#42
If this is real, it's a huge disappointment to me.
Reply
#43
oh, may I add that in the set 1 starter pack thing(with the cd) it had a picture of coketump. that way a looooooooong time ago and have we have got it yet, no.

oh and BTW if someone requests it, I will upload for you
Reply
#44
Not just on the CD case, it's also in the manual. Which is also where the HP Counter is.

The "Building Your Own Deck" page has a Coketump and Pink Teddy playing the iTCG.
Reply
#45
Well, he didn't upload the Ice Golem...

I still kinda skeptical of the T-1337 thing, but if this is all real, we can hope to have Krakia in the .59 patch. (it still doesn't deserve taking half of August to do it, though...)
Reply
#46
Well, I guess all these apparent changes will be one reason less to buy the new set.
Reply
#47
I guess if I can find it, i will scan it
EDIT-cant, threw it out >:O
Reply
#48
roflmao, finally karkia is the next~!

for all who doesn't understand- we're getting CWK and then karkia.

and p.s., i think we'll get it in like.. less than half year.
remember that we got the haunted house not long after nlc.. so.. CWK is actually the 2nd expansion of masteria. karkia is gonna be the 3rd.
Reply
#49
Roads Wrote:roflmao, finally karkia is the next~!

for all who doesn't understand- we're getting CWK and then karkia.

and p.s., i think we'll get it in like.. less than half year.
remember that we got the haunted house not long after nlc.. so.. CWK is actually the 2nd expansion of masteria. karkia is gonna be the 3rd.

I say that too
oh yeah, it actually krakia
Reply
#50
erich336 Wrote:oh, may I add that in the set 1 starter pack thing(with the cd) it had a picture of coketump. that way a looooooooong time ago and have we have got it yet, no.

oh and BTW if someone requests it, I will upload for you

Like I said before: I never said we would get it now, I said we might get it in the near future. BTW to proof of these "drastic" changes, Androo from SW put pictures of the cards, but IDK why he didnt put an Ice Golem card picture. Maybe hes lieing to us? There might not even be an Ice Golem in this next pack...well have to wait and see. I sent him a PM, asking if he could give us a picture of the Ice Golem card. Deff from SW said he would post some card scans soon. Androo also said he would post the card names, and all the code prizes either, after the patch or whenever he gets the chance to do it.
Here is the pics:
I still wonder why he doesnt have any Ice Golem Pics.
Hopefully he will PM me and see if there really is an Ice Golem Card.
[Image: MS4Card.jpg]
Reply
#51
may i point out the center card? it has one intreastig thing-
"rewards such as stirge-on-a-string"(I think)"or stirgeman cape
Reply
#52
WTH!
Nice cards @_@

I WANT ONE @_@
Reply
#53
Strange, none of them have an iHint, either.
Without an Ice Golem or a T-1337 iHint, i refuse to believe in either T-1337 or Coke Town.
If the Golem is real, it still does not justify Coke Town. It could be in Masteria....
Also, why would Nexon want to release Coke Town, of all things? When Magatia, Masteria, and Area Bosses still need to release, why bother with Coke Town?

The fact that those two Coketumps didn't make this kind of controversy is interesting.
If two Coketumps that appear in all starter sets doesn't cause this Coke Town argument, why does an Ice Golem, which is uncommon, do so?

(I desperately want Krakia, but I don't believe T-1337 is its Area Boss.)
Reply
#54
Just drop the talk of Coke Town, just because there's images of it appearing on things, that doesn't mean we're getting it.

Anyhow, I doubt it's fake, as I can't imagine anyone would waste their time drawing official looking iTCG art. He may have made up the descriptions and iHints, but I doubt that too.
Reply
#55
Taiketo Wrote:This makes me think it's all a bunch of BS, personally. Why would codes act differently, why would codes that shouldn't even be in the database yet come up as already used and not invalid?

This has happened before with another new set. The Maple server wasn't configured to use the new codes, as the cards aren't released yet, to my understanding. We need a server check or a patch to make the new codes usable.
Reply
#56
I still don't believe the T-1337 thing. Even if Nexon uses internet phrases on their iTCG, they have never used one as the name of a monster.

One of the cards is a Mithril Wristguard, which Isaac confirmed awhile back, so there is some truth out there.
Reply
#57
As for the T-1337 thing I think, since this is for GMS, I think they are using our phrases to gain our attention.
As for Stirgeman, I think they are spoofing Batman, because, again, they want to gain our attention.
(since batman just came out it would make sense they would put it in here)
...and I think it does say stirge on a string and stirgeman cape
As for the iHints, I will try an PM Adroo for pics of the Ice Golem and pics of the iHints.
I still doubt that we will get Coke Town in the next patch.
Reply
#58
randompeep Wrote:I still don't believe the T-1337 thing. Even if Nexon uses internet phrases on their iTCG, they have never used one as the name of a monster.

T-1337 looks more like an NPC than an enemy. The cards say he lost his/its memory and is running out of power.

Likely, one of his/its quests involve finding power sources for him.
Reply
#59
Itcg pizes so far:
Stirge on a String.
Stirgeman Cape.
Reply
#60
Well, I can't say much about the Coketown argument...
But about T-1339, he reminds me of Aline Grey...HurtLike he says that you were helping the future, but you were really dooming it... I am not sure, this is just a theory!Glitter

Stirge = A Bat
Stirgeman = Batman?
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: