2012-05-03, 06:21 PM
Andross Wrote:Are you implying that sports games are a recent thing with that "these days"? Because it wasn't too long ago that sports games were alongside fighting games as "things for hardcore gamers".
Can't stop laughing
I also like your little jab at how sports games have (most of the time) horrible gameplay, yet that isn't even mentioned with other types of games. There are games with horrible gameplay in every style. It's just that sport games tend to do it more often.
Good thing sports games are the only ones that can have bad gameplay, unlike my hardcore games of Dark Souls and Monster Hunter, which are intrinsically better since they involve things that are not possible to do in real life. Maybe developers should just stop making games based on things people can do in real life completely. I mean really, who would want to play a racing game when they could just try to get into Nascar and do it in real life? Or play Minecraft when there's perfectly good dirt, stone and wood outside that they could use to build or dig/mine/chop through? Bad exemple. The main interest of sport is the physical part of it, unlike building or playing with cars (just look at the kids's toys and you'll understand this).
This is literally the equivalent of someone complaining that non-fiction books are dumb/boring because it's not as interesting as fantasy or other fiction books. See above.
Do you not understand how different people can be interested in different things, or are you understanding this but being condescending and smug because "they like something I think is boring or stupid because my way is obviously better so they must be a bit slow"? I perfectly understand that people can like different things. Just arguing cause I have nothing better to do and want to find out why people like it. At this point, you still didn't give me a good reason.
answers in bold.