2012-05-02, 08:07 PM
Eos Wrote:Almost everyone wants to tell their side of a story, even if it's anonymously. Many former employers would love to tell things that were common knowledge at their company and can't be traced back to them, just to have let them out and embarrass a company they feel wronged by.If you really aren't looking for "dirt", then I'm not sure as to what you're hoping to get. What could they possibly tell you that you don't already know and won't be covered by NDA/considered "dirt"? If you want insight on Nexon's operations, I highly doubt ex-employees would divulge that, for the reasons listed above. What else could you possibly want to know? The working climate? That would be considered dirt. Any "common knowledge" things would really be things that -we- already know. Such as the fact that they don't ACTUALLY patrol the game as much as they claim to. Or that they filter the ticketing system and ignore the majority of tickets that they don't want to answer. So enlighten me as to anything else you wish to learn about Nexon.
That's mostly as irrelevant as your opinion though, since the actual interview questions I have are far more benign and practical. I'm not looking for dirt, because it couldn't possibly lower anyone's opinion of Nexon at this point. The people who hate them do so for their own reasons, the people who like them will do so until something happens to them personally to change their mind because if the experiences of others were enough to move that needle they'd all be in the hate camp by now.
And again, the only people who would actually agree to this interview would be low-level employees who don't actually understand the politics of the workplace well enough to realize it's a dumb move. I don't see Tiara doing anything like this, I'm sure she's smart enough to realize that it's better to leave the past behind (especially if she's looking for work). This is exactly why Joe never spoke up, and neither did Prose. BTW, an anonymous interview would serve little practical purpose in hiding said person's name, because we (and Nexon) all know who has recently been let go and is of a high enough position to actually have anything to say.
Trust me that I'd certainly be interested in gaining insight into Nexon's operations - but I just recognize that it's unlikely anyone will volunteer info, without some sort of payment/reward.

