2012-04-12, 06:50 AM
Dark Link Wrote:Well your chart is pretty much puts 80% of the classes in the "OMG so OP" category, 10% in "Balanced" and 10% in "Worthless".
The way it's set up, it's almost like a "Butthurt" chart.
"This class is OP, because it does better than me."
I'm an avid PvPer and top 5 in my server. I have much experience with almost every class (all the warriors, mechanic, BaM, Bishop, Shadower, Buccaneer, and few more I'm forgetting) and I'd like to think I know what I'm talking about. Also, I was invited to the Scania hosted all-worlds PvP tournament if that means anything to you. My paladin has legitimately lost a match to only 3 people, all of whom were not any of the "OP" classes I've listed. I even made a Paladin PvP guide too (but it's somewhat outdated). But enough with the ego-flaunting and credential-spam.
-
The chart is just a satirical representation of the current metagame... so no doubt dissenters will get all up in arms about the chart and defending their class (just look at the comments). But I can assure you there's a legitimate reason for each bubble.
I've already talked this over with other top PvPers in other worlds and the one and only thing I would change is putting Marksman in balanced. Also, the way the revamp changes the 3 Explorer classes will need time to judge.
Right now it's super late and I'm tired; if you don't agree with a bubble, I'll give you a wall-of-text that explains the reasoning behind it tomorrow.
But then again, I'm fine with staying on topic lol.
EDIT: Can you guys even follow a flow chart? It's a process of elimination: 1 class can only end up in 1 category...
EDIT2: Also this is taking into account of GMS server lag; with no lag at all (and I mean zero lag, not just "good" but 100mb/s Korean-grade connection lagless) there would only be "OP" and "Balanced".