Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
What's better %INT, %Damage or %Mattk?
#7
From the all known formulas thread:

MAX DAMAGE = MULTIPLIER * (4 * PRIMARY STAT + SECONDARY STAT) * (ATTACK / 100)

(Mage multiplier is 1)

The three % factors are multiplicative in the damage equation. In simple terms, think of it as (Int) * (Matk) * (Total Damage). So what proportion they raise your overall damage does depend on what you already have. You essentially start with 100% of each, and then add +% bonuses to them. If you already have +100% int from equips, going from 200% to 201% int is like a .5% overall range increase. Whereas if you don't have any % damage already, going from 100% damage to 101% damage is like a 1% overall range increase.

Your least improved factor is where you can make the most improvement. Being as %damage is "rarer" and there are fewer sources of it, so frequently it will do more for your damage than an equivalent amount of %attack.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
What's better %INT, %Damage or %Mattk? - by Exidous - 2012-03-23, 03:21 PM
What's better %INT, %Damage or %Mattk? - by Thorr - 2012-03-25, 10:46 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)