2011-07-05, 03:27 PM
Lozmaster Wrote:Can't speak for america, or this case, (were all the court proceedings televised there?) since this is the first i've heard of it. All I know is last time something hugely publicised went wrong in the UK involving a person and their offspring with tragic consequences, the media decided the parents were guilty and gave them hell, and convinced a very vocal amount of the country they did it, without any solid proof. Yeah, turned out they didn't have anything to do with it.
If the people whose job it was to convince the jury that she did it were not able to do so, they can therefore chose to vote not guilty as they did.
I also think its extremely dubious that some of you think the judge should just go on and say at the end of the trial,"nope you're all wrong, heres the right verdict : guilty". Really?
That is the implication, yes. Of course the police should keep investigating until more evidence turns up that eithers is enough to convince jurors that Casey did do it, or infact, someone else did.
I'm sure everyone on southperry knows better than to try arguing with you over anything though, that'd be like trying to cut grass by staring at it, nothings going to happen to change your mind no matter what because once you make up your mind, you insist you're right no matter what (I know I'm pretty much the same about it.) but you're not in the jury for the trial. it was not up to you to decide if she was guilty of murder or not.
I'm sorry but your opinion is way off if you don't even know what the case or circumstantial evidence was. In fact you just look stupid by posting that gibberish.