2011-07-05, 02:46 PM
xLeviathan Wrote:Without solid evidence everyone making a judgment is just 12 regular joes. It's all touchy-feely what-d-you-think? kind-of bullpomegranate. As it is true the circumstantial evidence puts her in the right place at the right time, it also allows for the child to have drowned in the pool. It's opinion at that point.
Are you serious? There's no evidence she drowned.
Let's assume she did drown, let's use the defense's case where EVIL EVIL GEORGE had told her to dispose of the body because she would be blamed. Let's assume that is the truth. What good reason is there to go out partying for the next 31 days? To get a TATTOO THAT SAYS "THE GOOD LIFE"
The evidence is circumstantial but it's more than just compelling, it's completely damning. This jury is either full of morons or full of people seeking fame and figured they'd get more by doing the controversial thing.