Archer Hero Confirmed? New Pirate and Resistance Chars?

Oh, I know what the word means, and if you knew what it meant, you should know EXACTLY why your original post is full of irony. I shouldn't have to explain it to you otherwise.

I can see why the strategy that involves you saying nothing would be the easier one.

And you clearly don't know either Mr. "Let's compared a Red Mage vs Mystic Knight" even though you're denying it.

I see what you did there: you said what I said to you back to me!

I'm not denying anything. I basically said "See this apple? It is a fruit."

Definition? What definition? You already claimed that there was no such definition of what a "Magic Warrior" really is as stated by your above post. Now you're going to tell me that there actually IS a definition of "Magic Warrior"?

Magic Warrior = proper noun that would delineate a class
magical warrior = adjective describing pertaining to magic followed by a noun which it describes.

Is it really that hard to follow?

You already compared and contrasted Red Mage vs Mystic Knight, too late for that.

Let me draw a timeline for you.
11:21 - "Link is a magical warrior." - me
11:25 - "You're comparing Link to a 'Magic Warrior'." - you
11:46a - "I wasn't comparing anything." - me
11:46b - *compares Red Mage to Mystic Knight* -me
11:54 - "You already compared and contrasted Red Mage vs Mystic Knight." - you

Now, you may not be aware of this, but "was" (the word that forms the first half of the contraction "wasn't") is the past tense form of the word verb "be".
That means that the event to which I am referring occurred before the statement, not after.
So, yes, I had compared Red Mages and Mystic Knights by 11:54, but I had not before making the first statement I made at 11:46(a).

Alright, so I'll admit I screwed up my definition on what a "Red Mage" is, that doesn't make the other point any less valid in where WKs are classified as "Mystic Knights", just like all the other classes you mentioned above.

Actually, you screwed up both definitions.
As I said, "Mystic Knights", by definition, are not limited to casting spells on their weapons.
In fact, again by definition, they can't be limited to casting spells on their weapons.

At the end of the day though, it's irrelevant since this entire portion of the argument is just one user (you) trying to draw parallels between two different series.
As fun as that might be, it's far from definitive.

Right...You DO realize that I'm far from the only one who believes so as well, right? Or are you just that close-minded?

That was my point. Hence "sheep-mind".

I might be more inclined that you came to that conclusion of your own accord if not for you (as well as those who have said it previously) stating it in almost the precisely same manner.

Honestly though, either way, I'm rather apathetic.
If you have a problem with the way I post, you're better off passive aggressively giving me negative "reputation".
I'm under the impression that that's why that system exists. Either way, I find it to be absolutely cute.

While you may not share my sentiments, I shudder thinking of the day in which biased, subjective opinion is valued as fact.