Stereo Wrote:Can we get any more superstitious? The camera is not evil, it won't steal your soul, it's not going to hurt you. It doesn't refine light into pure evil. It's the person carrying the camera who is doing something inappropriate, or the person looking at the picture who is doing something inappropriate (for those 40% mentioned who do molest children). The 15% who solicited people online are a little sketchier, but is talking to someone a crime? If they don't like it, they can close the window, ignore you, etc.
Five year old children in a civilized society are not supposed to fuuck. Fuucking five year old children in a civilized society against their will is considered to be unnatural because five year old children are not supposed to fuuck.
You discuss something if it has two sides. This is not a two-side topic. Who the fuuck would have their kid being raped on camera? This topic is inappropriate for discussion even more so than is the topic of raping women. Women certainly pull their share of sketchy $hit, but aside from certain countries in the Middle East I cannot think of any place where the male rapist actually has "rights" or an "argument" in front of society. Rape involves overwhelming a woman physically, which causes her severe emotional damage, as well as a potential pregnancy, (think of carrying your rapist's baby for 9 months,) and transmitting STDs. Rapists probably won't be so considerate as to use a condom. Most rape victims are best described as annihilated; but the child is more fragile than a grown woman, and far more defenseless.
I read books with adult content, (including fuucking,) at a very young age, but I did not comprehend sexuality at the age of 4 and 6, even while reading about it. If it is inappropriate to force yourself on a woman who is weaker then you, then how the hell is it appropriate to force yourself on a child, who is not only weaker, but most likely doesn't have the developed psyche or the parental education to give consent? Is raping a woman "natural?" Then how is raping a child "natural?" How do you make child porn without raping a child, Stereo? It's not the camera that's evil, it's what's in front of it, and that's a child being abused and raped. You show me a guy who says 5 year olds should be raped, and I'll show you a society that wants to blow his head off.
This is the third time I've encountered this sort of topic on the internet. Honestly, even 4chan bans for this $hit. Fuucking 4chan. If moot allows barfcocks, goatse, tubgirl, guru, and a host of other charming topics, but not child porn, even while being monitored by the FBI, I think by golly we DO perhaps have some reason to assume that it IS inappropriate.