2011-04-03, 06:22 PM
CommanderJinn Wrote:Nope, it looks like you're pretty worked up about it.The third quote has absolutely nothing to do with the first two quotes. The first to were part of a discussion over whether the top right character was meant to resemble a thief, not whether or not the formation and those included was significant.
I was under the impression that the majority of users on this forum actually read posts to which they replied and were quoting, but apparently not.
CommanderJinn Wrote:No they're not. They've done mistakes with class representation before.Where? Where and when have they made mistakes with class representation with an official image out of NxKR?
FACT: Both characters in the back row are pirates, as proven by their equips as well as their presence in a former banner clearly showing their both pirates. (for some reason nexon changed the look on their official brawler art to have the knuckler only be on one hand)
FACT: It means absolutely nothing.
FACT: There's going to be a Warrior, Magician, and Bowman update.
Everything else regarding other classes as well as possible legends are speculation and conjecture. Deal with it.
- I already know that both characters in the back row are pirates. That was not only my initial stance, but it was proven to be fact.
- I know it means absolutely nothing. I've said that. You quoted me saying that.
- No pomegranate.
Was your post anything other than an exercise in improperly contextualizing quotes and blatantly stated pre-established facts? I never speculated as to whether or not the back two characters held any meaning; the only thing I've argued is that both are, in fact, pirates.
But, once again, thank you so much for not paying attention so that I may, in what I'm sure is a futile effort, have to reclarify myself at least one more time.

