2011-03-29, 12:00 AM
kanevaldier Wrote:Or maybe the word he defined was not a word that I used. Perhaps you should read my posts before saying that.
You said: Inconsequential.
He Defined: Consequence.
The breakdown:
Inconsequential = In-(prefix) x Consequence x -ial (suffix; simple form: -al)
In(prefix) = Not, Without
-ial = pertaining to
Inconsequential = Without x Consequence x pertaining to = Without x pertaining to x consequence
Inconsequential = without pertaining to consequence.
Now, using the definition provided by Kalovale:
Inconsequetial = (Without pertaining to)(That which follows something on which it depends; that which is produced by a cause.) = Without pertaining to that which follows something on which it depends; Without pertaining to that which is produced by a cause.
In short, thread should have ended here:
Spoiler
Why drawn so emo kanevaldier?


![[Image: shouldi.jpg]](http://img821.imageshack.us/img821/3175/shouldi.jpg)