Democracy in Egypt or islamic take over?

There has to be a process for the loss in communication; and to make it painfully transparent for you, I have roughly outlined the train of thought that most of us seem to have had, please be kind enough to enlighten us where we went ever so wrong.

There are two scenarios:
1/ Obama listening to the consults offered to him and make appropriate interventions: Boom, zip, bang, conflict prevented.
¬B ⇒ ¬A ⇒ ¬C

2/ Obama refusing to do 1/: Ka-boom-bee-boom, conflict waged.
B ⇒ A ⇒ C

I have to say this....lol. You like many others here like to only see thing as "balck and white" when in fact there is no such thing. It is grey. There are not only 2 choices here, there are many, far more than even I can consider. Obama made his decision based on his thought that it was a democratic movement in that country. He was told that the military had connections with the brotherhood and he chose to ignore that information and continued to call for Mubarak to step down. Mubarak was reluctant to do so because of the fact that he knew about the brotherhoods motives. If you knew all or most of the facts behind the situation you would see the issue. Like I stated, the brotherhood is very much against Israel and the U.S.

Not Even one time did I say that it was Obama's fault. I have put in the facts of the situation here. One of those facts is that the brotherhood did make a statement saying that once Mubarak was gone and a new government was formed the peace with Israel would also be done.