2011-03-26, 04:00 AM
Fiel Wrote:No? That's not even close to what he said.
He said that Obama was incorrect about the Brotherhood. That's completely separate from his other argument about how now that the Brotherhood is going to go to war with Israel (taking his word for granted) that now we will have to fight with the Brotherhood. Two different things bro.
A: Obama was wrong? Why?
Quote:Obama is not knowledgeable in matters of foreign policy
Which means:
B: He didn't do this: (otherwise he wouldn't have been wrong)
Quote:First, he could have listened to the people around him telling him about the Brotherhood. Then he could have taken that information to heart. He could have also put some pressure on the egyptian military to not turn power over to the brotherhood.
Which led to
C: This happens:
Quote:Tell that to Israel when the Brotherhood decides to take action against them. We will be drawn into yet another conflict if that happens because we would be treaty bound to do so.
Am I confusing something?
There are two scenarios:
1/ Obama listening to the consults offered to him and make appropriate interventions: Boom, zip, bang, conflict prevented.
2/ Obama refusing to do 1/: Ka-boom-bee-boom, conflict waged.
Enlighten me, gentlemen, how the pineapple is it not implied to have been Obama's fault?