2011-03-23, 08:29 PM
Anonymous Moose Wrote:I'l admit that the orginal title suffered from poor word choice and did not properly reflect upon the original article, but I'm going to stick to the current one since I believe it the title should be based on the article itself and I believe the title now properly reflects the article and the fact that the event is now past tense.
For the second article, I mostly felt it was necessary to validate a claim at the end of the video in question in the article. So it would be a simple add on in my opinion.
My intent was obviously to show hypocrisy, but this is the current event's section, and the article is what reflects a current event.
Anyway, I think we should get back on topic.
Seems kind of (pardon my lack of vocabulary) stupid... I mean you're referring more to the video then the article.