2011-03-23, 08:22 PM
Erebus Wrote:So the title should reflect that and not the apparent "conspiracy theory of youtube bias".
I'l admit that the orginal title suffered from poor word choice and did not properly reflect upon the original article, but I'm going to stick to the current one since I believe it the title should be based on the article itself and I believe the title now properly reflects the article and the fact that the event is now past tense.
For the second article, I mostly felt it was necessary to validate a claim at the end of the video in question in the article. So it would be a simple add on in my opinion.
My intent was obviously to show hypocrisy, but this is the current event's section, and the article is what reflects a current event.
Anyway, I think we should get back on topic.

