US Soldiers Pose With Dead Civilian Corpses

Please define responsible before continuing this conversation because based on your original quote you keep avoiding, you have a completely mistranslation of the word.

Use a dictionary

I'm talking from a humane standpoint. I'm pretty sure your purposely misinterpreting me because I cannot fathom how you got me comparing the situations legally vs how humans act in general. People kill people because they are pineappleed up and no one knows about it. Military or not, the only difference is whos giving the ass whooping. None the less my point is no establishment can avoid this. Period.

And yet, realistically this is more than just a Human Rights issue, and while both sorts of crimes are unacceptable, both have clear differences and different repercussions.

What's the point of terrorism hm? Pretty much threatening with violence and such to get their way. Well the women was cussing the attendant out and throwing tomato juice. Spanking? Not so much of an issue, cursing and making a ruckus over something so pineappleing silly, yes that ignorant peach belongs in jail.

You ignore the point entirely. Her act was declared Terrorism, and with the new definition of terrorism, I doubt most terrorists have any information worth interrogating or torturing them over.

The soldiers did act alone. It's in your damn article that you evidently didn't read. Unless you're throwing away its credibility? Anyway, I'm pretty sure this isn't a common occurance. Do the math and tell me what you come up with. 6 instances vs' uh how many men in iraq right now?.

Evidently, you lack the ability to read. My statement was not about this event, just these sorts of crimes in general - which should investigate to see if commanding officers are at fault (gave orders to torture, etc.) or if they are simply not fulfilling their duty to prevent such attrocities.

I read this and whole-heartidly lol'd. The only thing ridiculous is the TS coming in and saying its the administrators that have direct control over this. Implied by his statement "Nothing's changed".

We'll, what has changed? We still get into illegal wars. We still have torture and guantanamo.

Notice can. Those are possibilities, but once again, nothing too major imo. Brain damage and lung damage can be easily avoided by not doing it for x amount of time. Although I don't reccomend this for every criminal, but a war criminal? pineapple it, I hope you become retarded and so do your children.

And if you really think pulling out of iraq was a realistic, ha.

Do our soldiers take steps to avoid brain and lung damage? And how is brain and lung damage "nothing major?"

As for Iraq, yes it is reasonable to pull out of there. The reason we went there in the first place was to get the weapons of mass destruction. Ah, but then we learned that there were none. Hmmm....guess it was about oil then.

To add, the Bush administration actively looked for all excuses and "evidence" no matter how flimsy or unverifiable it may be. Most evidence they provided was unverifiable, fabricated, or completely misrepresended.
Not to mention, as always dissenting opinion and facts where not allowed.