2011-03-21, 07:17 PM
Subsection 1 and 3 say the same thing, except subsection 3 adds an extra requirement. Awareness. How odd.
I'm sorry, A_M. In case you missed the clear Article 87 in my post, and the clear link to article 87 in the post directly above it:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>http://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/U...nglish.pdf <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Anonymous Moose Wrote:Explain. If you mean this statement: "If he cant control his subordinates, then he has no right to lead."
It doesnt imply he is at fault. It could be a number of various things including believing that he is incompetent and doesnt deserve to lead.
and link?
I'm sorry, A_M. In case you missed the clear Article 87 in my post, and the clear link to article 87 in the post directly above it:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>http://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/U...nglish.pdf <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<