2008-08-26, 10:13 PM
Calvinist Wrote:The supporting class isnt stronger than AMs. Only they're full screen attack is more efficient than an AM because of the current maps available.And 99% of mages spam said full screen attack to train.
Calvinist Wrote:Once Arch Mages get better maps things will change, but it's not something to obsess over.135% stronger (more like 120% due to the base attack difference), 200% more expensive. Maybe when attacks were 50 MP a cast that was a good trade-off, but not 3500.
Calvinist Wrote:And I'll say it again - these staves have helped AMs regardless of there being a elemental bonus on it or not! AMs can now be much stronger than what they were before.Suppose, for some ludicrous reason, Nexon decided that everyone in the game would have a permanent +10% damage boost. Yay, AMs are stronger than they were before.
Strength is relative.
Calvinist Wrote:Finally, the same thing goes, if you wanted a character thats easily accepted into bossing/parties then a bishop would have been a wiser choice. Only one job of each class is usually dominant of getting chosen into parties.I wanna revise that a little...
"If you wanted a character that's easily accepted into bossing/parties, levels faster, is cheaper to maintain, and does everything in general better, then a bishop would have been a wiser choice."
That's pretty much how it stands right now.

