2008-08-24, 10:22 AM
butterfli Wrote:They've had that "advantage" since level 82. Also genesis is faster than blizzard with a 11+ speed booster so the bishop does more damage overtime.
If you want to consider other skills of the bishop, invincible is godly. Most bishops I see take around 1.3k from newties and my archmage takes 2k.
As I said before, on neutral monsters AMs do better DPS, even with genesis's 2 extra casts per minute.
Hazzy Wrote:One of the main arguments that makes bishops better than arch mages is the fact that the best monster to train on has ALWAYS been weak to holy.
Maple was first released - coolies
After that it was grims
then himes
then skeles
See the pattern?
Trying to keep giving slite advantages to arch mages (okay this monster is neutral/yeah the arch mage is using an elemental staff) isn't going to make them have any edge over a bishop.
Bishops have:
Holy symbol
Better defense skills (ER and invincible)
Friggin Heal
Resurection
Ultimate that doesnt take 2x mp
End game monsters weak to holy
I don't hate mages, but it seems like Nexon just might.
Actually, KMS's new strongest mob in the Time Temple is the fire monsters, which are strong to fire, neutral to holy and (apparently) neutral to ice. Even so, I/L AMs do the best dmg to them.
Dusk Wrote:I don't get why you would use an ult on a single target o_____o
It looks impressive hitting 50k or whatever, but they do a lot less damage over time than my BM at 122...don't Paralyze and CL outdamage Meteo/Blizz on single targets?
I'm saying if you were very high lvled and were trying to solo zakum, you could do some major dmg to his arms, with AMs doing more.