I do not know, I honestly don't.
Just at a glance, the fraction version is the most sensible-looking (as I've said) but it doesn't have INT/2 in it, which is why I made this thread in the first place.
I didn't mean number of targets hit, I meant the specific type of monster. Mainly for MDEF and element attribute, but you get the level too just in case.
Just at a glance, the fraction version is the most sensible-looking (as I've said) but it doesn't have INT/2 in it, which is why I made this thread in the first place.
Cyanne Wrote:If you're comparing spell damage to heal damage, keep in mind that they're totally different, and their formulas for damage are different. We've already known for a long time that int independently had a small effect on non-heal magic damage. Also, the number of targets hit is pointless because non-heal mob spells deal the same damage to all monsters hit by the spell, whether there are one or fifteen monsters.I realize. I know that it's been done before, and the INT/2 is known (it's part of Neko's version of the formula) but the F part of his is a bit shaky. And the other two I've seen don't include INT/2.
I didn't mean number of targets hit, I meant the specific type of monster. Mainly for MDEF and element attribute, but you get the level too just in case.