2008-08-13, 05:54 PM
Wait what?
I'm assuming that by "she'd" you mean the person which contains the unique opinions.
You make your own opinion by taking lots of raw data--taking a look at the world, examining some of the more pertinent pieces of information such as the reasonability of after-life and why there must/must not be a god overlooking/not overlooking our Earth--and then formulating a hypothesis which fits all of your current data. Once you are given more raw data to deal with, you CHANGE your hypothesis to fit the new data. This is not how the Christian system has been run. It has been the same myth that it has been for 2,000 years.
The Bible does have quite a few useful ideas such as not murdering/raping, but it is absurd to WORSHIP a person simply because a book dictates so.
Quote:And may I ask, where does someone's *own opinion* come from? Is it truly unique? If it were, she'd probably be on the fringes of society. If it's not, then it came from somewhere else.
I'm assuming that by "she'd" you mean the person which contains the unique opinions.
You make your own opinion by taking lots of raw data--taking a look at the world, examining some of the more pertinent pieces of information such as the reasonability of after-life and why there must/must not be a god overlooking/not overlooking our Earth--and then formulating a hypothesis which fits all of your current data. Once you are given more raw data to deal with, you CHANGE your hypothesis to fit the new data. This is not how the Christian system has been run. It has been the same myth that it has been for 2,000 years.
The Bible does have quite a few useful ideas such as not murdering/raping, but it is absurd to WORSHIP a person simply because a book dictates so.