Question about Str/Luk shadowers

Then why do you bother setting bad examples here then if you don't even play your Shadower? Not all of us suck at it because we dump our APs into HP, hindering everything.

STR Shadowers have more possibilities. You're suppose to go Mid/Low-DEX, trying to keep your base LUK high for MW to affect along with the amount of WATT. Since STR Shadowers have a higher base WATT given on Dagger/Shields, it really helps.

What the hell would you do with 160 DEX? Do you not know how to cap your actual stats, and build equipment? You're trying to justify your little math game by giving them a high amount of DEX / STR.

Try actually making a character for once, instead of dumping your APs into HP all the time.

EDIT: Funny thing also, your HP(HB+MG) is 2k higher then mine, and I'm a Shadower with an actual damage range.

EDIT2: If you want to do an ACTUAL number game, don't forget the equipment, stats, and MW. You also made an error, STR goes into damage range, why did you not count that in, and what the pineapple did you do to the LUK? Don't forget Cygnus buff.

I should just report you for flaming here, but since I hate reporting people, I won't.

Can't dispute my arguments with facts that prove me wrong and trying to "personally" attack me to prove you're correct? Please...comon...

Anyway, if you had taken a really quick look into the data, you could have seen Dusk's numbers already contain most of what you're saying, I included the Cygnus buff myself (+12att), just remember, the more Cygnus watt buff you get, the more watt advantage a STR Shadower loses compared to a LUK Shadower...

lol'd at how you deducted 40 LUK from STR Shadowers. You do know that it's extremely easy to be a STRless Low-DEX Shadower, don't you? STR Shadowers are stronger and they look better, period. Whatever point you're trying to get across doesn't mean anything; they'll always be weaker.

I didn't do anything more then copy/paste.