Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
44 tons of rotten meat
#5
TobiasBlack Wrote:eminent domain buddy. if the people saw it as a nuisance, and the state had to remove it, then of course the owner should be held accountable. he shouldve disposed of it properly, instead of abandoning it. lazy ass.

ED only applies if the land was seized to be used by the...was it state? Anyways, this was a city matter, not state, and had nothing to do with the city seizing his property for its purposes, only with the city hiring people to clean the mess that was creating a foul odor throughout.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
44 tons of rotten meat - by MasPan - 2009-10-04, 04:06 PM
44 tons of rotten meat - by Deviant - 2009-10-04, 04:13 PM
44 tons of rotten meat - by MasPan - 2009-10-04, 04:21 PM
44 tons of rotten meat - by TøbiasBlack - 2009-10-04, 04:29 PM
44 tons of rotten meat - by MasPan - 2009-10-04, 04:31 PM
44 tons of rotten meat - by Hazzy - 2009-10-04, 04:32 PM
44 tons of rotten meat - by y0y0y0y0shi0 - 2009-10-04, 04:33 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: