2009-08-31, 09:01 PM
(This post was last modified: 2009-08-31, 09:02 PM by TøbiasBlack.)
shikage, youre a bucc in jMS, correct?
correct me if im wrong, but buccs get a few moves with invincibility frames, right? wouldnt one idea for taking down PB be to take 2 buccs, a shad, priest, and an attacker, to challenge the Bean? (why isnt it called pink being instead?) i mean, yeah the big flaw with that would be that theres a lack of active shad's and bucc's in gMS (as far as i can tell), but given that there can be, what, roughly 6 parties(?) per team, with each team filling their attacker spots with a NL, WK, BM/MM, i/L-AM/f/p-AM, hero, and captain/DrK (one per party, like one party has the NL, one has the WK, one either of the AM's, and so on); wouldnt it be possible to take down PB?
EDIT::
just counted, with that model, theres still one spot per team; lets just fill that with w/e, ok? or why not a mix of the attacker classes, hm? o-o
correct me if im wrong, but buccs get a few moves with invincibility frames, right? wouldnt one idea for taking down PB be to take 2 buccs, a shad, priest, and an attacker, to challenge the Bean? (why isnt it called pink being instead?) i mean, yeah the big flaw with that would be that theres a lack of active shad's and bucc's in gMS (as far as i can tell), but given that there can be, what, roughly 6 parties(?) per team, with each team filling their attacker spots with a NL, WK, BM/MM, i/L-AM/f/p-AM, hero, and captain/DrK (one per party, like one party has the NL, one has the WK, one either of the AM's, and so on); wouldnt it be possible to take down PB?
EDIT::
just counted, with that model, theres still one spot per team; lets just fill that with w/e, ok? or why not a mix of the attacker classes, hm? o-o