Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Where do you get the conclusion that 1h bw has shorter reach than 1h sword?
#22
Fiel Wrote:An Arcglaive has the same reach as any other polearm. Stonetooth is SwordTL.

poleArm: Swing (polearms do not have a type "T1" swing)
swingT2.lt.x - (-120)
swingT2.lt.y - (-125)
swingT2.rb.x - (-52)
swingT2.rb.y - (20)

WidthBox = |-120| + |-52| = 172
HeightBox = |-125| + |20| = 145
AreaBox = 172 * 145 = 24,940 pixels

Dunno why you use absolute values like that o.o isn't that bounding box like this?
[Image: poleswingx.png]
Size of this box is |(-120-(-52)) x (-125-20)| = 9860 px


I'm not sure if that's the right swing but it's hard to catch them since they're very similar. 1 starts in front of the body, 2 behind and come from slightly different locations. This is one of the 'back' ones, not sure which.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Where do you get the conclusion that 1h bw has shorter reach than 1h sword? - by Stereo - 2009-07-12, 02:13 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: