Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Where do you get the conclusion that 1h bw has shorter reach than 1h sword?
#21
Fiel Wrote:An Arcglaive has the same reach as any other polearm. Stonetooth is SwordTL.

poleArm: Swing (polearms do not have a type "T1" swing)
swingT2.lt.x - (-120)
swingT2.lt.y - (-125)
swingT2.rb.x - (-52)
swingT2.rb.y - (20)

WidthBox = |-120| + |-52| = 172
HeightBox = |-125| + |20| = 145
AreaBox = 172 * 145 = 24,940 pixels

SwordTL: Swing
swingT1.lt.x - (-100)
swingT1.lt.y - (-95)
swingT1.rb.x - (-47)
swingT1.rb.y - (2)

WidthBox = |-100| + |-47| = 147
HeightBox = |-95| + |2| = 97
AreaBox = 147 * 97 = 14,259 pixels

Hmm, good to know. Coulda sworn that surfboards and the lv 50 PA (The Nine Dragons) had a shorter reach, but I guess that's false then. Nine Dragons in particular is one hell of a short PA, about the same length as an average 2h sword.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Where do you get the conclusion that 1h bw has shorter reach than 1h sword? - by MasPan - 2009-07-12, 02:00 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: