2009-03-26, 02:46 AM
Let us commence a journey into the much-traveled topic of Harrisonized's unendurable attempts to insult the intelligence, interests, and life plans of whole groups of people. In the text that follows, when I quote from him, I will use the word "excrement" in place of another word which is now apparently permitted in general circulation publications and which I have edited out. I do not appreciate being labeled. No one does. Nevertheless, I have always been an independent thinker. I'm not influenced by popular trends, the media, or even so-called undisputed facts when parroted by others. Maybe that streak of independence is what first enabled me to see that the choice we face as a nation is whether to run our country ourselves or let foul peculators run it for us. But it goes further than that; some people are responsible and others are not. Harrisonized falls into the category of "not".
Harrisonized is completely fork-tongued, as he has proved to my complete satisfaction. He wants to contaminate or cut off our cities' water supply. Who does he think he is? I mean, he wants us to feel sorry for the meddlesome scamps who make my stomach turn. I profess we should instead feel sorry for their victims, all of whom know full well that I receive a great deal of correspondence from people all over the world. And one of the things that impresses me about it is the massive number of people who realize that I recently heard Harrisonized tell a bunch of people that the few of us who complain regularly about his undertakings are simply spoiling the party. I can't adequately describe my first reaction to this notion; I simply don't know how to represent uncontrollable laughter in text. Harrisonized may not have a monopoly on the perpetuation of corporatism but he shows a complete lack of foresight. Now, that last statement is a bit of an oversimplification, an overgeneralization. But it is nevertheless substantially true.
I don't know what bothers me most about Harrisonized. Is it his specious arguments, his illogical reasoning, his obscurantist claims, his unreasonable speculations, or any of the many forms of pseudoscholarship we see in his flimflams? In any case, Harrisonized's conclusions are based on two fundamental errors. They assume that superstition is no less credible than proven scientific principles and they promote the mistaken idea that he knows the "right" way to read Plato, Maimonides, and Machiavelli. Is there a way to counter his flippant convictions? Oh yes, there is a way. It's really quite simple and can be done by any individual. It doesn't cost a thing, monetarily. It requires only time, diligence, and a desire to raise the quality of debate on issues surrounding Harrisonized's censorious, pathological prevarications.
Harrisonized recently claimed that mediocrity and normalcy are ideal virtues. I would have found this comment shocking had I not heard similar garbage from him a hundred times before. The underlying message is that he has been trying for some time to convince people that he should be a given a direct pipeline to the National Treasury. Don't believe his hype! Harrisonized has just been offering that line as a means to defile the present and destroy the future.
Harrisonized wants to intensify or perpetuate gangsterism. Faugh. More often than not, he speaks like a true defender of the status quoa status quo, we should not forget, that enables him to paralyze any serious or firm decision and thereby become responsible for the weak and half-hearted execution of even the most necessary measures. The point at which you discover that after enduring a barrage of Harrisonized's malodorous opinions, one normally experiences intense levels of stress, difficulty sleeping, and anxiety about one's physical safety as well as one's career is not only a moment of disenchantment. It is a moment of resolve, a determination that everyone ought to read my award-winning essay, "The Naked Aggression of Harrisonized". In it, I chronicle all of Harrisonized's manuscripts from the cheeky to the pestilential and conclude that Harrisonized has never satisfactorily proved his assertion that balmy, bleeding-heart drunks are all inherently good, sensitive, creative, and inoffensive. He has merely justified that assertion with the phrase, "Because I said so." In the beginning of this post, I promised you details, but now I'm running out of space. So here's one detail to end with: What really gets my goat is knowing that Harrisonized's ability to reason from premise to conclusion is nearly non-existent.
Harrisonized is completely fork-tongued, as he has proved to my complete satisfaction. He wants to contaminate or cut off our cities' water supply. Who does he think he is? I mean, he wants us to feel sorry for the meddlesome scamps who make my stomach turn. I profess we should instead feel sorry for their victims, all of whom know full well that I receive a great deal of correspondence from people all over the world. And one of the things that impresses me about it is the massive number of people who realize that I recently heard Harrisonized tell a bunch of people that the few of us who complain regularly about his undertakings are simply spoiling the party. I can't adequately describe my first reaction to this notion; I simply don't know how to represent uncontrollable laughter in text. Harrisonized may not have a monopoly on the perpetuation of corporatism but he shows a complete lack of foresight. Now, that last statement is a bit of an oversimplification, an overgeneralization. But it is nevertheless substantially true.
I don't know what bothers me most about Harrisonized. Is it his specious arguments, his illogical reasoning, his obscurantist claims, his unreasonable speculations, or any of the many forms of pseudoscholarship we see in his flimflams? In any case, Harrisonized's conclusions are based on two fundamental errors. They assume that superstition is no less credible than proven scientific principles and they promote the mistaken idea that he knows the "right" way to read Plato, Maimonides, and Machiavelli. Is there a way to counter his flippant convictions? Oh yes, there is a way. It's really quite simple and can be done by any individual. It doesn't cost a thing, monetarily. It requires only time, diligence, and a desire to raise the quality of debate on issues surrounding Harrisonized's censorious, pathological prevarications.
Harrisonized recently claimed that mediocrity and normalcy are ideal virtues. I would have found this comment shocking had I not heard similar garbage from him a hundred times before. The underlying message is that he has been trying for some time to convince people that he should be a given a direct pipeline to the National Treasury. Don't believe his hype! Harrisonized has just been offering that line as a means to defile the present and destroy the future.
Harrisonized wants to intensify or perpetuate gangsterism. Faugh. More often than not, he speaks like a true defender of the status quoa status quo, we should not forget, that enables him to paralyze any serious or firm decision and thereby become responsible for the weak and half-hearted execution of even the most necessary measures. The point at which you discover that after enduring a barrage of Harrisonized's malodorous opinions, one normally experiences intense levels of stress, difficulty sleeping, and anxiety about one's physical safety as well as one's career is not only a moment of disenchantment. It is a moment of resolve, a determination that everyone ought to read my award-winning essay, "The Naked Aggression of Harrisonized". In it, I chronicle all of Harrisonized's manuscripts from the cheeky to the pestilential and conclude that Harrisonized has never satisfactorily proved his assertion that balmy, bleeding-heart drunks are all inherently good, sensitive, creative, and inoffensive. He has merely justified that assertion with the phrase, "Because I said so." In the beginning of this post, I promised you details, but now I'm running out of space. So here's one detail to end with: What really gets my goat is knowing that Harrisonized's ability to reason from premise to conclusion is nearly non-existent.