2009-03-26, 01:48 AM
I will not waste my time criticizing or insulting Harrisonized as 1) he is unlikely to change, and 2) Harrisonized probably revels in the posts of shock and repulsion that he regularly receives. Instead, I will focus on his malign policies, which, after all, are the things that overthrow all concepts of beauty and sublimity, of the noble and the good, and instead drag people down into the sphere of his own base nature. For most of the facts I'm about to present, I have provided documentation and urge you to confirm these facts for yourself if you're skeptical. He has delivered exactly the opposite of what he had previously promised us. Most notably, Harrisonized's vows of liberation turned out to be masks for oppression and domination. And, almost as troubling, his vows of equality did little more than convince people that his latest manifesto, like all the ones that preceded it, is a consummate anthology of disastrously bad writing teeming with misquotations and inaccuracies, an odyssey of anecdotes that are occasionally entertaining but certainly not informative.
I'm sure Harrisonized wouldn't want me to eavesdrop on his secret conversations. So why does he want to maintain social control by eliminating rights and freedoms? This can be answered most easily by stating that he must have some sort of problem with reading comprehension. That's the only explanation I can come up with as to why he accuses me of admitting that honor counts for nothing. What I actually said is that Harrisonized does not tolerate any view that differs from his own. Rather, he discredits and discards those people who contradict him along with the ideas that they represent. All I can tell you is what matters to me: Harrisonized insists that there should be publicly financed centers of pauperism. That lie is a transparent and strained effort to keep us from noticing that he is too negligent to read the writing on the wall. This writing warns that his toadies have been staggering around like punch-drunk fighters hit too many times—stunned, confused, betrayed, and trying desperately to rationalize his sinister codices. It is truly not a pretty sight. But this is something to be filed away for future posts. At present, I wish to focus on only one thing: the fact that if he can't cite the basis for his claim that we should avoid personal responsibility then he should just shut up about it.
Not to put too fine a point on it but Harrisonized is indubitably up to something. I don't know exactly what, but his ideologies should be labeled like a pack of cigarettes. I'm thinking of something along the lines of, "Warning: It has been determined that Harrisonized's beliefs are intended to devastate vast acres of precious farmland." Is there anyone else out there who's noticed that the worst kinds of unenlightened freaks I've ever seen are responsible for the passive-aggressive tenor of his invectives? I ask because he somehow manages to maintain a straight face when saying that bad things "just happen" (i.e., they're not caused by Harrisonized himself). I am greatly grieved by this occurrence of falsehood and fantastic storytelling which is the resultant of layers of social dishevelment and disillusionment amongst the fine citizens of a once organized, motivated, and cognitively enlightened civilization. It strikes me as amusing that he complains about people who do nothing but complain. Well, news flash! Harrisonized does nothing but complain. Finally, any one of the points I made in this post could be turned into a complete research paper, but the conclusion of each would be the same: I haven't the foggiest idea why Mr. Harrisonized wants to break down the industrial-technological system.
I'm sure Harrisonized wouldn't want me to eavesdrop on his secret conversations. So why does he want to maintain social control by eliminating rights and freedoms? This can be answered most easily by stating that he must have some sort of problem with reading comprehension. That's the only explanation I can come up with as to why he accuses me of admitting that honor counts for nothing. What I actually said is that Harrisonized does not tolerate any view that differs from his own. Rather, he discredits and discards those people who contradict him along with the ideas that they represent. All I can tell you is what matters to me: Harrisonized insists that there should be publicly financed centers of pauperism. That lie is a transparent and strained effort to keep us from noticing that he is too negligent to read the writing on the wall. This writing warns that his toadies have been staggering around like punch-drunk fighters hit too many times—stunned, confused, betrayed, and trying desperately to rationalize his sinister codices. It is truly not a pretty sight. But this is something to be filed away for future posts. At present, I wish to focus on only one thing: the fact that if he can't cite the basis for his claim that we should avoid personal responsibility then he should just shut up about it.
Not to put too fine a point on it but Harrisonized is indubitably up to something. I don't know exactly what, but his ideologies should be labeled like a pack of cigarettes. I'm thinking of something along the lines of, "Warning: It has been determined that Harrisonized's beliefs are intended to devastate vast acres of precious farmland." Is there anyone else out there who's noticed that the worst kinds of unenlightened freaks I've ever seen are responsible for the passive-aggressive tenor of his invectives? I ask because he somehow manages to maintain a straight face when saying that bad things "just happen" (i.e., they're not caused by Harrisonized himself). I am greatly grieved by this occurrence of falsehood and fantastic storytelling which is the resultant of layers of social dishevelment and disillusionment amongst the fine citizens of a once organized, motivated, and cognitively enlightened civilization. It strikes me as amusing that he complains about people who do nothing but complain. Well, news flash! Harrisonized does nothing but complain. Finally, any one of the points I made in this post could be turned into a complete research paper, but the conclusion of each would be the same: I haven't the foggiest idea why Mr. Harrisonized wants to break down the industrial-technological system.

