2009-03-24, 01:39 AM
Although I have no criticism of Sicnarf's conclusions, I have a few observations and comments to share. For complete details, I refer you to my forthcoming book on the subject. I shall here mention only a few random items that may be new or especially interesting to you. For instance, Sicnarf wants to prey on people's fear of political and economic instability. You know what groups have historically wanted to do the same thing? Fascists and Nazis.
Sicnarf is known for publishing what is easily identifiable as opinion under the guise of fact. Hence and therefore, if you intend to challenge someone's assertions, you need to present a counterargument. He provides none. I'm not one to criticize, but I wish that one of the innumerable busybodies who are forever making "statistical studies" about nonsense would instead make a statistical study that means something. For example, I'd like to see a statistical study of Sicnarf's capacity to learn the obvious. Also worthwhile would be a statistical study of how many rambunctious skinflints realize that Sicnarf likes to seem smarter than he really is. It therefore always amuses me whenever he cracks open a thesaurus, aims for intellectualism, misses, and lands squarely in a puddle of gruesome frippery.
This is not the first time I've wanted to convert retreat into advance. But it is the first time I realized that he insists that doing the fashionable thing is more important than life or liberty. This fraud, this lie, is just one among the thousands he perpetrates. Lousy, stupid bourgeoisie often take earthworms or similar small animals and impale them on a pin to enjoy watching them twist and writhe as they slowly die. Similarly, Sicnarf enjoys watching respectable people twist and writhe whenever he threatens to destroy everything beautiful and good. Ever since he decided to glorify squalid Sicnarf clones, his consistent, unvarying line has been that the Eleventh Commandment is, "Thou shalt treat people's bona fide personal devastation as bathos". He says he's going to squeeze every last drop of blood from our overworked, overtaxed bodies in the coming days. Good old Sicnarf. He just loves to open his mouth and let all kinds of things come out without listening to how illiterate they sound.
It is pointless to fret about the damage already caused by Sicnarf's vile insinuations. The past cannot be changed. We must cope with the present if we hope to affect our future and warn the public against those heartless slackers whose positive accomplishments are always practically nil but whose conceit can scarcely be excelled. So that there may be no misunderstanding, let me make it clear that I should note that Sicnarf is out to expose and neutralize his enemies rather than sit at the same table and negotiate. And when we play his game, we become accomplices. I want you to know that he formulates his expositions in a precarious latticework between the evil and the unforgiving. Knowing, as they say, is half the battle. What remains is to take away as many of Sicnarf's opportunities for mischief as possible.
Are you still with me? There is no place in this country where we are safe from Sicnarf's vassals, no place where we are not targeted for hatred and attack. Sicnarf keeps telling us that governments should have the right to lie to their own subjects or to other governments. Are we also supposed to believe that our unalienable rights are merely privileges that he can dole out or retract? I didn't think so. We find among narrow and uneducated minds the belief that Man's eternal search for Truth is a challenge to be avoided at all costs. This belief is due to a basic confusion that can be cleared up simply by stating that in the Old Testament, the Book of Kings relates how the priests of Baal were slain for deceiving the people. I'm not suggesting that there be any contemporary parallel involving Sicnarf, but Sicnarf has two imperatives. The first is to operate on a criminal—as opposed to a civil disobedience—basis. The second imperative is to have more impact on Earth's biological, geological, and chemical systems during our lifetime and our children's than all preceding human generations had together. To close, let me accentuate that if we take a proactive, rather than a reactive, stance we shall not only survive Sicnarf's attacks; we shall prevail.
Sicnarf is known for publishing what is easily identifiable as opinion under the guise of fact. Hence and therefore, if you intend to challenge someone's assertions, you need to present a counterargument. He provides none. I'm not one to criticize, but I wish that one of the innumerable busybodies who are forever making "statistical studies" about nonsense would instead make a statistical study that means something. For example, I'd like to see a statistical study of Sicnarf's capacity to learn the obvious. Also worthwhile would be a statistical study of how many rambunctious skinflints realize that Sicnarf likes to seem smarter than he really is. It therefore always amuses me whenever he cracks open a thesaurus, aims for intellectualism, misses, and lands squarely in a puddle of gruesome frippery.
This is not the first time I've wanted to convert retreat into advance. But it is the first time I realized that he insists that doing the fashionable thing is more important than life or liberty. This fraud, this lie, is just one among the thousands he perpetrates. Lousy, stupid bourgeoisie often take earthworms or similar small animals and impale them on a pin to enjoy watching them twist and writhe as they slowly die. Similarly, Sicnarf enjoys watching respectable people twist and writhe whenever he threatens to destroy everything beautiful and good. Ever since he decided to glorify squalid Sicnarf clones, his consistent, unvarying line has been that the Eleventh Commandment is, "Thou shalt treat people's bona fide personal devastation as bathos". He says he's going to squeeze every last drop of blood from our overworked, overtaxed bodies in the coming days. Good old Sicnarf. He just loves to open his mouth and let all kinds of things come out without listening to how illiterate they sound.
It is pointless to fret about the damage already caused by Sicnarf's vile insinuations. The past cannot be changed. We must cope with the present if we hope to affect our future and warn the public against those heartless slackers whose positive accomplishments are always practically nil but whose conceit can scarcely be excelled. So that there may be no misunderstanding, let me make it clear that I should note that Sicnarf is out to expose and neutralize his enemies rather than sit at the same table and negotiate. And when we play his game, we become accomplices. I want you to know that he formulates his expositions in a precarious latticework between the evil and the unforgiving. Knowing, as they say, is half the battle. What remains is to take away as many of Sicnarf's opportunities for mischief as possible.
Are you still with me? There is no place in this country where we are safe from Sicnarf's vassals, no place where we are not targeted for hatred and attack. Sicnarf keeps telling us that governments should have the right to lie to their own subjects or to other governments. Are we also supposed to believe that our unalienable rights are merely privileges that he can dole out or retract? I didn't think so. We find among narrow and uneducated minds the belief that Man's eternal search for Truth is a challenge to be avoided at all costs. This belief is due to a basic confusion that can be cleared up simply by stating that in the Old Testament, the Book of Kings relates how the priests of Baal were slain for deceiving the people. I'm not suggesting that there be any contemporary parallel involving Sicnarf, but Sicnarf has two imperatives. The first is to operate on a criminal—as opposed to a civil disobedience—basis. The second imperative is to have more impact on Earth's biological, geological, and chemical systems during our lifetime and our children's than all preceding human generations had together. To close, let me accentuate that if we take a proactive, rather than a reactive, stance we shall not only survive Sicnarf's attacks; we shall prevail.