2014-06-15, 07:30 PM
xBTAx Wrote:Oh, there's no majority? Then [Vote] Words.
To begin with, Words alone doesn't confirm Meta if Meta isn't sane. But even ignoring the possible inclusion of sanity, then yes, we have 2-3 doors to open... but with no comparison between the cops, we have no idea who could be lying about even being a cop and just trying to get us to lynch their target. I mean, even if Meta's telling the truth, that doesn't mean the other two are. And, again, if the targets are generic innocents there's no way for them to verify their innocence (as a claim could) and that means easy mislynches. I'd rather deal with the cops and just lynch someone based on suspicions as normal tomorrow if they all check out than leave us open to being misled at a critical time. Really, the three targets just leaves things way too open to manipulation, because if the one target is protected and one "cop" is killed then we get the other twos' reports; if one of the three targets dies then the report of the person who targeted them is worthless (or nonexistent, as Holy indicated might be the case).
.
We have an accusation backed with confidence enough to even admit she'll get lynched either way. I feel this is the only lead we have that has any credibility. Although the other two could possibly be crazy, the determination will be after we come to it. Wasting a night investigating one person through 3 people, is a waste of resources, and a waste of a night.
At this point we should just validate the claim and cross the next bridge based on the results/reactions