2014-02-16, 06:09 PM
I don't expect much people to find it fascinating or interesting tbh, I asked quite alot straight forward questions and I mentioned who I wanted the questions to be about but i don't want to influence anyone when first coming up with a view point. Sorry if it comes off as vague and unintelligible, hard to avoid given the constraints.
1)Do you think they are just as crazy religious people?
2)Do you even think they existed and acted in the capacity people claim the did and do?
3)Do many people even believe the stuff they are suspected of doing?
4)Does anyone even care in the first place?
"I'm referring to influential people in this realm such as Manly P. Hall, Francis Bacon, Benjamin Franklin, Aleister Crowley, Anton Szandor LaVey,the great families who control the federal banks (or who are claimed to control: Goldman Sachs, Rockefellers, Lehmans and Kuhn Loebs of New York; the Rothschilds of Paris and London; the Warburgs of Hamburg; the Lazards of Paris; and the Israel Moses Seifs of Rome)."
Does that make it simpler to understand the questions? Those were all taken from my first post.
And yes i'm aware this is in the circle of conspiracy. No i'm trying not to change anyone's mind on the matter, if you read my reply to HumSoftly you would see I was more interested in understanding why and how he came to those conclusions. I did address the skewed perspective people draw, which was the very last paragraph that I didn't whiteout because that was the main focus of my reply, the rest was more like thoughts out-loud in which asked how did he come to that conclusion given the evidence. I did not say he was outright wrong, I tried to show the implications of the actions by those people hence the example of the thief, and how people may view it as insignificant even though there is proof.
@Kanye West, i'm not trying to mention you i'm comparing to the kanye west because of your name and attitude, not sure if you are being ignorant on purpose or not tbh. I'm also not trying to prove my worth to anyone or my credibility, this is a forum, one of many I use, i'm putting stuff on the board and absorbing the responses for my own reasons, i'm not here on a maple forum to change the attitude or opinion of the world *facepalm*. I don't come on here to be politically correct so that i'm deemed respectable in your and anyone else's eyes on this forum. If anyone sees my way of doing things unsuitable so be it, move on to another thread, i'm here to gather opinions through my method. Doesn't really matter to me if you can understand it or not, it works either way for me.
Sorry if that offends but this is the internet, it exists for my personal gain and not to evaluate my self-worth. I try to give helpful responses from time to time in other threads to promote good forum morale, but other times I have very selfish reasons.
1)Do you think they are just as crazy religious people?
2)Do you even think they existed and acted in the capacity people claim the did and do?
3)Do many people even believe the stuff they are suspected of doing?
4)Does anyone even care in the first place?
"I'm referring to influential people in this realm such as Manly P. Hall, Francis Bacon, Benjamin Franklin, Aleister Crowley, Anton Szandor LaVey,the great families who control the federal banks (or who are claimed to control: Goldman Sachs, Rockefellers, Lehmans and Kuhn Loebs of New York; the Rothschilds of Paris and London; the Warburgs of Hamburg; the Lazards of Paris; and the Israel Moses Seifs of Rome)."
Does that make it simpler to understand the questions? Those were all taken from my first post.
And yes i'm aware this is in the circle of conspiracy. No i'm trying not to change anyone's mind on the matter, if you read my reply to HumSoftly you would see I was more interested in understanding why and how he came to those conclusions. I did address the skewed perspective people draw, which was the very last paragraph that I didn't whiteout because that was the main focus of my reply, the rest was more like thoughts out-loud in which asked how did he come to that conclusion given the evidence. I did not say he was outright wrong, I tried to show the implications of the actions by those people hence the example of the thief, and how people may view it as insignificant even though there is proof.
@Kanye West, i'm not trying to mention you i'm comparing to the kanye west because of your name and attitude, not sure if you are being ignorant on purpose or not tbh. I'm also not trying to prove my worth to anyone or my credibility, this is a forum, one of many I use, i'm putting stuff on the board and absorbing the responses for my own reasons, i'm not here on a maple forum to change the attitude or opinion of the world *facepalm*. I don't come on here to be politically correct so that i'm deemed respectable in your and anyone else's eyes on this forum. If anyone sees my way of doing things unsuitable so be it, move on to another thread, i'm here to gather opinions through my method. Doesn't really matter to me if you can understand it or not, it works either way for me.
Sorry if that offends but this is the internet, it exists for my personal gain and not to evaluate my self-worth. I try to give helpful responses from time to time in other threads to promote good forum morale, but other times I have very selfish reasons.