Tropes Vs Women 2 - Damsels In Distress Part Two : Circular Arguments Strike Back

Haha, the turn this thread took after I was gone for a couple days is quite funny. But since I apparently have some things to sort out here, here I go:

First, sorry Sardines for mistaking you for Harrison. Other people were mentioning it and I mistook you for him. Should've just called you Sardines, sorry.

He's originally swerve.

Not even going to confront your first paragraph as it's a grab for sympathy.

As for your complaint of her blocking Youtube comments, I've seen some musicians that disable comments in some of their videos but not in others. I'll give you an example too. Tegan and Sara's Northshore has comments disabled but their newest song I Was A Fool doesn't. They are both sisters and are both gay and get harassed by Youtubers all the time for it I believe. If you look at the I Was a Fool video, top rated comment is "Actually they are human beings. Not dykes". Not saying this has anything to do with this particular tropes video but sometimes if you know what the comments are going to be like you may as well just disable them. It can be seen as hiding from bad press much like an embattled politician but people with conviction stick with their conviction normally no matter how much bad press it gets them. It's a part of being able to freely speak your mind and that should be encouraged rather than what some, including you, are trying to do, which is shut her up. She may overuse the melodrama a bit. So what. If you are trying to get people to listen to you you have to use some means to get them to. And she has gotten you. She shall now enjoy some ad revenue thanks to you but not thanks to me because I did not watch the video. Yes you heard me, everything I've been talking about is because I didn't watch it. And why? Because it had spoilers dammit! I HATE SPOILERS. So I went the general way and not the warpath a few of you have taken in your quest to support or defame this woman. I didn't want to take part in that.

Except, ya know, the last album with about 8 songs, all with comments on, don't see any of that harassment at all. But yeah, let's use an example from 2010.

As for your "anything on youtube would be badly rated/attacked over "mundane" things" idea, I said good things, not everything. Some things should make you angry. Some videos you will agree or disagree with the musician or reviewer or anybody with an opinion on something you have an opinion on. It just seems like an obsession to some Youtubers to drag down all that is good in something to a level where it fits their image of what it should be or whether or not it is 100% complete in its logic etc. Presentation is part of it like you said because people generally like theatrics. As for your half the rage these people have comment, I would actually like a bit more information on that as what has yet to be said in this thread is how people who make Youtube videos communicate with their fans and handle that rage. And no I will not watch your videos, you big meanie

If you wish not to indulge into actual perspective where people with intelligent criticism are frustrated at the fact she not only silences you, she hides in a castle for any other form of contact, and has her femnazi dogs rip you apart at any shred of negative feedback. Again, I shouldn't be telling you this as I did take the effort to put up a video to support this.

Get off my high horse? I'll have you know that I am a tall fellow and if I am in need of a horse I would actually need a high horse to be able to ride.

If you really care about what people think of you, go post in the "My picture thread". Although I'm sure it would be ignored.

But do you care about other people's problems? No, it's just me me me. I hate this, I love that, nobody is listening to me, why are you all such idiots and not listening to my opinion...wah wah wah.

My daily job is to listen and solve other peoples problems all day everyday. Her problems are melodramatic as her video analysis. I can make a personal judgement, not on her content, but her actions following it, her responses concerning the criticism, and her hypocritical victimizing.

My perspective was to try and inform a bit on issues that were being said by Sardines but not being reinforced by anyone else.

That was a conversation you decided to take. To obnoxiously point out that your "conversation" had more value than my multiple, is instigating and frankly unnecessary. As he himself as said, we are talking about a point that doesn't interest him, and one I really wanted to confront from the first thread, but avoided.

It doesn't matter to me if anybody listens because I know by now that nobody listens to me. I just like talking and since it's a free country and free forum you'll just have to put up with it.

I'll take this as sarcasm to get the benefit of the doubt, as a "free country" has no relevance to a web page, which isn't by definition a "free" forum when it has very strict policies on nudity, although necessary.

Oh and no I will not reply to anything else said in this thread as Locked summed it up pretty much.

That's great, there's just so much unnecessary information you can tolerate before snapping.