2012-11-06, 08:25 AM
I'd like to add a point on the issue of replacing any profit removed by modification. Let's just pretend our ideas are being read and seriously considered by Nexon management for a moment.
New ideas not only have to meet existing profits, but exceed them. Nexon is never going to risk a major business or game model change if they expect it to merely meet current profits. They need to read the plan and see big shiny dollar signs in front of their eyes to lead them around like a carrot on a stick. There is a lot of risk involved in even the more reasonable things being suggested.
Oh and not only do you have to have ideas about making massive amounts of money, they need to meet the exclusion principle. Whatever the idea is, it cannot coexist with any of the methods being eliminated. Otherwise Nexon could just add it and have two heaps of money instead of just one.
This is the point where I'd love to make a brilliant heretofore unmentioned idea full of brilliance and ingenuity.
Too bad I don't have any
Feel free to let me know if anyone else gets the big shiny light bulb over their head.
New ideas not only have to meet existing profits, but exceed them. Nexon is never going to risk a major business or game model change if they expect it to merely meet current profits. They need to read the plan and see big shiny dollar signs in front of their eyes to lead them around like a carrot on a stick. There is a lot of risk involved in even the more reasonable things being suggested.
Oh and not only do you have to have ideas about making massive amounts of money, they need to meet the exclusion principle. Whatever the idea is, it cannot coexist with any of the methods being eliminated. Otherwise Nexon could just add it and have two heaps of money instead of just one.
This is the point where I'd love to make a brilliant heretofore unmentioned idea full of brilliance and ingenuity.
Too bad I don't have any
Feel free to let me know if anyone else gets the big shiny light bulb over their head.