![]() |
|
A small reminder - Printable Version +- Southperry.net (https://www.southperry.net) +-- Forum: Main (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=11) +--- Forum: Site Announcements (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=18) +--- Thread: A small reminder (/showthread.php?tid=70941) |
A small reminder - Five Second Pose - 2014-04-29 Alright, let's take a look at the spam rule. [faq]rr_spam[/faq] More specifically, that bit before the additional comments. With the advent of the "+1" system a "me too"/"i agree" post with no purpose or further elaboration of it's own in a discussion thread would also be considered spam as would "reaction" images. Of late there have been far too many otherwise good people getting infracted for this. Please remember to not just post a reaction image. It's fine if you're responding to one post or one part of a post with a reaction image and then responding to a different post or continuing to respond to another part of a post. Reaction images by themselves are spam. Thank you. A small reminder - Hanabira.Kage - 2014-04-29 Maybe you should get Eos to force people to read this thread. You know, that "you have to read the following thread before you may continue" thing.
I think this is pretty important. :x A small reminder - Shidoshi - 2014-04-29 "A picture is worth a thousand words, only not on Southperry." A small reminder - Niernen - 2014-04-29 So would just the image by itself be spam?
A small reminder - Marksman Bryan - 2014-04-29 I think there are many situations where just a picture is a valid response. However, I don't think a large majority of people understand when it is/isn't appropriate - which is why I believe that part of the rule is in place. For people that want to reply with an image - throw on a sentence or two to clarify your image response. Hell, talk about anything relevant to the thread. Can't get an infraction that way. [MENTION=10201]Niernen[/MENTION]; i'm not a mod but I would consider just that image spam. it serves no purpose to the thread, and the same message can be portrayed with a +1. A small reminder - Five Second Pose - 2014-04-29 Niernen Wrote:So would just the image by itself be spam? Yes. Keep in mind the other part of the spam rule applies too - if I was to post this Quote: it's still spam because you could've done that by +1ing and not posting. A small reminder - Hanabira.Kage - 2014-04-29 Marksman Bryan Wrote:i'm not a mod but I would consider just that image spam. it serves no purpose to the thread, and the same message can be portrayed with a +1. In other words:
Clearly, ![]() A small reminder - holycow - 2014-04-29 Five Second Pose Wrote:Yes. Keep in mind the other part of the spam rule applies too - if I was to post this But there's canada in it. What has canada done to offend you? D: A small reminder - Five Second Pose - 2014-04-29 holycow Wrote:But there's canada in it. What has canada done to offend you? D: I live there, so nothing...? A small reminder - IllegallySane - 2014-04-29 So in other words. No sole reaction images, and no circle jerking (non-lewd kind of course). A small reminder - xparasite9 - 2014-04-29 IllegallySane Wrote:So in other words. No sole reaction images, and no circle jerking (non-lewd kind of course). so that means the other kind is somehow allowed? A small reminder - Hanabira.Kage - 2014-04-30 xparasite9 Wrote:so that means the other kind is somehow allowed? That's taken care of by the obscenity rule.
A small reminder - Sardines - 2014-05-01 Five Second Pose Wrote:Of late there have been far too many otherwise good people getting infracted for this. Please remember to not just post a reaction image. It's fine if you're responding to one post or one part of a post with a reaction image and then responding to a different post or continuing to respond to another part of a post. Reaction images by themselves are spam. Thank you.I disagree with this post. I don't think that people who get infractions can be considered good people. After all, they broke the rules of the site after being warned about it. A small reminder - y0y0y0y0shi0 - 2014-05-01 Sardines Wrote:I disagree with this post....I'd hardly say someone isn't a good person because they get a minor warning on a web forum for maplestory. A small reminder - DeanNim - 2014-05-02 i agree with this thread.
Spoiler
A small reminder - Stereo - 2014-05-02 ![]()
I don't agree with this interpretation of the rules. Reaction images certainly could be spam (see the above 'yes yes yes' gif) but frequently are not.
|