![]() |
|
NERDGASMED - Printable Version +- Southperry.net (https://www.southperry.net) +-- Forum: Social (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=14) +--- Forum: Shenanigans (https://www.southperry.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=51) +--- Thread: NERDGASMED (/showthread.php?tid=27121) |
NERDGASMED - Kortestanov - 2010-06-30 http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/latest-trunk/firefox-4.0b2pre.en-US.win32.zip ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/latest-trunk/firefox-4.0b2pre.en-US.win32.zip pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/latest-trunk/firefox-4.0b2pre.en-US.win32.zip mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/latest-trunk/firefox-4.0b2pre.en-US.win32.zip firefox/nightly/latest-trunk/firefox-4.0b2pre.en-US.win32.zip nightly/latest-trunk/firefox-4.0b2pre.en-US.win32.zip latest-trunk/firefox-4.0b2pre.en-US.win32.zip firefox-4.0b2pre.en-US.win32.zip firefox-4.0b2pre.en-US.win32 firefox-4.0b2pre.en-US firefox-4.0b2pre 4.0b2pre 4.0b2 4.0b 4.0 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
NERDGASMED - TøbiasBlack - 2010-06-30 ...wut? NERDGASMED - shroum - 2010-06-30 no mac version D: what seems to be so good about this update? EDIT: WHOA just realized I hit 900 posts... o.o must of been my previous one. yay can of soup? NERDGASMED - Hazzy - 2010-06-30 TøbiasBlack Wrote:...wut? Firefox 4.0 *joins in nerdgasming* NERDGASMED - Horusmaster - 2010-07-02 fail
Chrome 5.0 with lots of useless extensions vs Clean firefox 4.0
NERDGASMED - Hazzy - 2010-07-02 FF 3.6 w/ 20 extentions and a 2 GB DL running from Korea
Spoiler
Meh, memory usage was never the strong point in FF. FF still wins with addons. Ew... is that really what FF4 looks like? It's just a Square Chrome. ._. Chrome with Adblock and maybe another addon or two. Otherwise clean, as far as I can remember.
Spoiler
NERDGASMED - MetaSeraphim - 2010-07-02 Opera > all. NERDGASMED - Horusmaster - 2010-07-02 MetaSeraphim Wrote:Opera > all.It sure is faster than firefox, but not chrome
NERDGASMED - Hazzy - 2010-07-02 DL'd Opera to try this out... it looks just like that FF4. .__. Opera feels a lot faster and smoother than Chrome or FF. Based off of 30 seconds of use. But it loads pages slower. Maybe it's just me counting the Elements along with the browser.
Spoiler
Lolninja. Since this is now a Browser-Wars thread, what kind of addons do Opera and Chrome have? NERDGASMED - Horusmaster - 2010-07-02 Hazzy Wrote:Since this is now a Browser-Wars thread, what kind of addons do Opera and Chrome have? For chrome at least, basically all the useful addons in firefox NERDGASMED - Hazzy - 2010-07-02 What do you classify as "useful"? WOT, AdBlock Plus, NoScript, Ubiquity, Undo Closed Tab, and GreaseMonkey fall into it? NERDGASMED - Horusmaster - 2010-07-02 Hazzy Wrote:What do you classify as "useful"? Let see: chrome have WOT, adblock as addons. undo closed tab should be in the browser and not as an addon, which chrome did (I'm surprised firefox didn't) Never heard of Ubiquity, according to wikipedia, it sounds like iMacro on chrome, I don't think I'd ever use it. No script is not needed, because it's 2 primary use, block ads is covered by adblock extension, and preventing malicious activity is covered by the chrome browser. GreaseMonkey is an developer tool which is not intended for an average user. NERDGASMED - Sn1perJohnE - 2010-07-02 Is it just me.....or arent the scores affected by your computers hardware as well :c| NERDGASMED - Hazzy - 2010-07-02 Horusmaster Wrote:GreaseMonkey is an developer tool which is not intended for an average user. "An average user" can just copy the plethora of free scripts that are available online. It's so much more than a dev tool. :/ Ubiquity is nice because I can press Ctrl Space and look something up on Google, YouTube, or Wikipedia without having to reach for a mouse. If one was motivated enough, they could make it search any engine. http://mozillalabs.com/ubiquity/ I doubt there's an addon for it in Opera or Chrome, but something that functions similarly isn't too far fetched. I don't use anything beyond the search anyway. Sn1perJohnE Wrote:Is it just me.....or arent the scores affected by your computers hardware as well :c| Clearly, as it runs stuff through the browser. Better computers will get better scores because they can do it faster. However, testing multiple browsers on the same computer should give an accurate comparison. NERDGASMED - Sn1perJohnE - 2010-07-02 "should". Either way, I like this article. http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/25/html5-speed-test-finds-ie9-firefox-3-7-lead-the-pack-in-windows/ NERDGASMED - Hazzy - 2010-07-02 Firefox 3.7? Waitwhat. Testing link thing. http://ie.microsoft.com/testdrive/Performance/FishIE%20tank/ My results: Opera lasted until 100 or 250 Fish at 1217 x 961 size FF lasted till 50 Chrome has 6 FPS at 1 Fish. NERDGASMED - Sn1perJohnE - 2010-07-02 Hazzy Wrote:Firefox 3.7? Waitwhat. My FF (3.6) was running 5 FPS with 1000 fish. No crash. NERDGASMED - Hazzy - 2010-07-02 When I say "lasted", I mean useable FPS. FF runs 30~40 FPS at 20 Fish. ;-; I'd restart it, but I'm still DLing.... 4 FPS at 1000, but it's really slow to update even that. Same for Opera. NERDGASMED - Sn1perJohnE - 2010-07-02
Huge 1440xImage
NERDGASMED - Horusmaster - 2010-07-02 Hazzy Wrote:"An average user" can just copy the plethora of free scripts that are available online. It's so much more than a dev tool. :/So now, the web developers are going to go like, to view this page perfectly, we recommend you to use firefox with greasemonkey, and then download this script and run this script with greacemonkey, because we're too lazy to copy/paste this script onto our websites. Hazzy Wrote:Ubiquity is nice because I can press Ctrl Space and look something up on Google, YouTube, or Wikipedia without having to reach for a mouse. If one was motivated enough, they could make it search any engine.You just press enter in chrome..... |